Advertisement

MultiCost: Multi-stage Cost-sensitive Classification of Alzheimer’s Disease

  • Daoqiang Zhang
  • Dinggang Shen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7009)

Abstract

Most traditional classification methods for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) aim to obtain a high accuracy, or equivalently a low classification error rate, which implicitly assumes that the losses of all misclassifications are the same. However, in practical AD diagnosis, the losses of misclassifying healthy subjects and AD patients are usually very different. For example, it may be troublesome if a healthy subject is misclassified as AD, but it could result in a more serious consequence if an AD patient is misclassified as healthy subject. In this paper, we propose a multi-stage cost-sensitive approach for AD classification via multimodal imaging data and CSF biomarkers. Our approach contains three key components: (1) a cost-sensitive feature selection which can select more AD-related brain regions by using different costs for different misclassifications in the feature selection stage, (2) a multimodal data fusion which effectively fuses data from MRI, PET and CSF biomarkers based on multiple kernels combination, and (3) a cost-sensitive classifier construction which further reduces the overall misclassification loss through a threshold-moving strategy. Experimental results on ADNI dataset show that the proposed approach can significantly reduce the cost of misclassification and simultaneously improve the sensitivity, under the same or even higher classification accuracy compared with conventional methods.

Keywords

Cost-sensitive classification cost-sensitive feature selection MultiCost multi-modality Alzheimer’s disease (AD) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ron, B., Elizabeth, J., Kathryn, Z.G., Arrighi, H.M.: Forecasting the global burden of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association 3, 186–191 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Walhovd, K.B., Fjell, A.M., Dale, A.M., McEvoy, L.K., Brewer, J., Karow, D.S., Salmon, D.P., Fennema-Notestine, C.: Multi-modal imaging predicts memory performance in normal aging and cognitive decline. Neurobiol. Aging 31, 1107–1121 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vemuri, P., Wiste, H.J., Weigand, S.D., Shaw, L.M., Trojanowski, J.Q., Weiner, M.W., Knopman, D.S., Petersen, R.C., Jack Jr., C.R.: MRI and CSF biomarkers in normal, MCI, and AD subjects: predicting future clinical change. Neurology 73, 294–301 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cuingnet, R., Gerardin, E., Tessieras, J., Auzias, G., Lehericy, S., Habert, M.O., Chupin, M., Benali, H., Colliot, O.: Automatic classification of patients with Alzheimer’s disease from structural MRI: A comparison of ten methods using the ADNI database. Neuroimage (2010), doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.013 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kloppel, S., Stonnington, C.M., Chu, C., Draganski, B., Scahill, R.I., Rohrer, J.D., Fox, N.C., Jack Jr., C.R., Ashburner, J., Frackowiak, R.S.: Automatic classification of MR scans in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 131, 681–689 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fan, Y., Shen, D., Gur, R.C., Gur, R.E., Davatzikos, C.: COMPARE: Classification Of Morphological Patterns using Adaptive Regional Elements. IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging 26, 93–105 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hinrichs, C., Singh, V., Xu, G., Johnson, S.: MKL for robust multi-modality AD classification. In: Yang, G.-Z., Hawkes, D., Rueckert, D., Noble, A., Taylor, C. (eds.) MICCAI 2009. LNCS, vol. 5762, pp. 786–794. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davatzikos, C., Bhatt, P., Shaw, L.M., Batmanghelich, K.N., Trojanowski, J.Q.: Prediction of MCI to AD conversion, via MRI, CSF biomarkers, and pattern classification. Neurobiol. Aging (2010) (in press)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elkan, C.: The foundations of cost-sensitive learning. In: The 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 973–978 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhou, Z.H., Liu, X.Y.: Training cost-sensitive neural networks with methods addressing the class imbalance problem. IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Engineering 18, 63–77 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang, D., Chen, S., Zhou, Z.-H.: Constraint Score: A new filter method for feature selection with pairwise constraints. Pattern Recognition 41(5), 1440–1451 (2008)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chang, C.C., Lin, C.J.: LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang, D., Wang, Y., Zhou, L., Yuan, H., Shen, D.: Multimodal classification of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. NeuroImage 55(3), 856–867 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daoqiang Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dinggang Shen
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Radiology and BRICUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  2. 2.Dept. of Computer Science and EngineeringNanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations