Modeling Aircraft Operational Reliability

  • Kossi Tiassou
  • Karama Kanoun
  • Mohamed Ka
  • Christel Seguin
  • Chris Papadopoulos
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6894)


The success of an aircraft mission is subject to the fulfillment of some operational requirements before and during each flight. As these requirements depend essentially on the aircraft system components and the mission profile, the effects of failures can be very significant if they are not anticipated. Hence, one should be able to assess the aircraft operational reliability with regard to its missions in order to be able to cope with failures. This paper addresses aircraft operational reliability modeling to support maintenance planning during the mission achievement. We develop a modeling approach to represent the aircraft system operational state taking into account the mission profile as well as the maintenance facilities available at the flight stop locations involved in the mission. It is illustrated using Stochastic Activity Networks (SANs) formalism, based on an aircraft subsystem.


operational reliability model-based assessment aircraft system maintenance planning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ahmadi, A., Soderholm, P.: Assessment of Operational Consequences of Aircraft Failures: Using Event Tree Analysis. In: 2008 IEEE Aerospace Conference, pp. 1–14 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saintis, L., et al.: Computing in-service aircraft reliability. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering 16(02), 91 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Prescott, D., Andrews, J.: Aircraft safety modeling for time-limited dispatch. In: Proceedings of Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, pp. 139–145 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Daly, D., et al.: Möbius: An extensible tool for performance and dependability modeling. In: Schaumnurg, I.L., Haverkort, B.R., Bohnenkamp, H.C., Smith, C.U. (eds.) TOOLS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1786, pp. 332–336. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sachon, M., Paté-Cornell, E.: Delays and safety in airline maintenance. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 67(3), 301–309 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Papakostas, N., et al.: An approach to operational aircraft maintenance planning. Decision Support Systems 48(4), 604–612 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mura, I., Bondavalli, A.: Markov Regenerative Stochastic Petri Nets to Model and Evaluate Phased Mission Systems Dependability. IEEE Transactions on Computers 50(12), 1337–1351 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chew, S., et al.: Phased mission modelling of systems with maintenance-free operating periods using simulated Petri nets. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 93(7), 980–994 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kehren, C., et al.: Advanced Simulation Capabilities for Multi-Systems with AltaRica. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International System Safety Conference (ISSC), System Safety Society, pp. 489–498 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bernard, R., et al.: Experiments in model-based safety analysis: flight controls. In: First IFAC Workshop on Dependable Control of Discrete Systems, Cachan (2007),
  12. 12.
    Tiassou, K., Kaâniche, M., Kanoun, K., Seguin, C.: DIANA Operational Reliability — Modelling the Rudder System Using AltaRica and Stochastic Activity Networks, LAAS report No 11001Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bineid, M., Fielding, J.P.: Development of an aircraft systems dispatch reliability design methodology. The Aeronautical Journal 110(1108), 345–352 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ramesh, A., et al.: Advanced methodologies for average probability calculation for aerospace systems. In: 26th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tiassou, K., Kanoun, K., Kaâniche, M., Seguin, C., Papadopoulos, C.: Operational Reliability of an Aircraft with Adaptive Missions. In: Proceedings of the 13th European Workshop on Dependable Computing - EWDC 2011, p. 9 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kossi Tiassou
    • 1
    • 2
  • Karama Kanoun
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mohamed Ka
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christel Seguin
    • 3
  • Chris Papadopoulos
    • 4
  1. 1.CNRS, LAASToulouse Cedex 4France
  2. 2.Université de Toulouse, UPS, INSA, INP, ISAE, UT1, UTM, LAASToulouse Cedex 4France
  3. 3.ONERA/DCSD/CDToulouse Cedex 4France
  4. 4.AIRBUS Operations Ltd.FiltonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations