Empirical Analysis of the Effect of Knowledge Network Structure on Individual Creativity through Exploitation and Exploration
- 742 Downloads
This study proposes a type of individual creativity model that is comprised of knowledge network structure and creative process. Knowledge network structure represents degree centrality and structural holes that are driven by interactions among members in organization. In this model, we assume that individuals would yield different performances by complicated network structures. On the other hand, creative process includes exploration and exploitation. While exploitation is regarded as the existing solution, exploration is the development of new solutions. To validate our proposed model, we contacted the seven largest system integration companies in South Korea. Then, we collected the questionnaires of 73 members and their recently organized 7 teams, and analyzed the data by structural equation model. Our study found that degree centrality and structural holes significantly influence exploitation and exploration. Moreover, our results show that exploitation significantly has an effect on exploration, and both exploitation and exploration influence individual creativity positively.
KeywordsIndividual creativity Exploration Exploitation degree centrality structural holes
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Amabile, T.M.: A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior 10, 123–167 (1988)Google Scholar
- 2.Amabile, T.M.: Creativity in context. Westview Press, CO (1996)Google Scholar
- 7.Burt, R.S.: Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
- 8.Chin, W.W.: The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling. In: Marcoulides, G.A. (ed.) Modern methods for business research, pp. 295–336. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah (1998)Google Scholar
- 11.Ford, C.M.: A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review 21, 1112–1142 (1996)Google Scholar
- 14.He, Z.L., Wong, P.K.: Exploration vs Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis. Organization Science 15, 81–94 (2004)Google Scholar
- 24.Tiwana, A., McLean, E.R.: Expertise integration and creativity in information systems development. Journal of Management Information Systems 22, 13–44 (2005)Google Scholar
- 25.Wold, H.: Soft Modelling: The Basic Design and some Extensions. In: Jöreskog, K.G., Wold, H. (eds.) Systems Under Indirect Observation, Part II. North Holland Press, Amsterdam (1982)Google Scholar
- 26.Woodman, R.W., Sawyer, J.E., Griffin, R.W.: Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review 18, 293–321 (1993)Google Scholar