Devising an Optimal Scheme for Distributed Wireless Sensors for Patient Monitoring in Preventive Ubiquitous Healthcare

  • Giovanni Cagalaban
  • Seoksoo Kim
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 195)


This research studies the deployment of distributed wireless sensors for monitoring target patients. The wireless sensor network is used for monitoring of target patients, and report tracking to central database server containing the vital information. This study performs optimization scheme for optimal placement of sensors and movement coordination techniques within the monitored area. A movement tracking algorithm is proposed for better patient tracking techniques and aid in optimal deployment of wireless sensor networks. Results show that wireless sensors can be exploited to compensate for the lack of sensors and improved the network coverage of the patient being monitored.


wireless sensor ubiquitous healthcare patient monitoring 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Boric-Lubecke, O., Lubecke, V.: Wireless house calls: using communications technology for health care and monitoring. IEEE Microwave Magazine, 43–48 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Varday, P., Benyo, Z., Benyo, B.: An open architecture patient monitoring system using standard technologies. IEEE Transactions on Information Technologies in Bio-medicine 6(1), 95–98 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hung, K., Zhang, Y.: Implementation of a WAP-based telemedicine system for patient monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Information Technologies in Biomedicine 7(2), 101–107 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clouqueur, T., Phipatanasuphorn, V., Ramanathan, P., Saluja, K.: Sensor deployment strategy for target detection. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ferrari, S.: Track coverage in sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, pp. 2053–2059Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ram, S., Manjunath, D., Iyer, S., Yogeshwaran, D.: On the path coverage properties of random sensor networks. IEEE Transactions Mobile Computing 6(5), 446–458 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Howard, A., Mataric, M., Sukhatme, G.: Mobile sensor network deployment using potential fields: A distributed, scalable solution to the area coverage problem. In: DARS 2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dhillon, S., Chakrabarty, K.: Sensor placement for effective coverage and surveillance in distributed sensor networks. In: Proceedings of Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, vol. 3, pp. 1609–1614. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wettergren, T., Costa, R.: Optimal Placement of Distributed Sensors Against Moving Target. ACM Transactions for Sensor Networks 5(3) (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ko, J., Chen, Y., Lim, J.: Wireless Sensor Networks for Patient Monitoring. In: ACM Sigmobile/Usenix International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, MobiSys (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ucinski, D.: Optimal Measurement Methods for Distributed-Parameter System Identification. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schwartz, A., Polak, E., Chen, Y.: RIOTS, a matlab toolbox for solving optimal control problems (1997),

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giovanni Cagalaban
    • 1
  • Seoksoo Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MultimediaHannam UniversityDaejeonKorea

Personalised recommendations