Abstract
This paper examines the state of the science and the level of consensus in the digital forensics community regarding digital evidence examination. The results of this study indicate that elements of science and consensus are lacking in some areas and are present in others. However, the study is small and of limited scientific value. Much more work is required to evaluate the state of the science of digital evidence examination.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Y. Bar-Anan, T. Wilson and R. Hassin, Inaccurate self-knowledge formation as a result of automatic behavior, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 46(6), pp. 884–895, 2010.
California Sciences Institute, Forensics Database (FDB), Livermore, California (calsci.org).
G. Carlton and R. Worthley, An evaluation of agreement and conflict among computer forensics experts, Proceedings of the Forty-Second Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2009.
S. Cole, Out of the Daubert fire and into the Fryeing pan? Self-validation, meta-expertise and the admissibility of latent print evidence in Frye jurisdictions, Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology, vol. 9(2), pp. 453–541, 2008.
Federal Judicial Center, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (Second Edition), Washington, DC (www.fjc.gov/public/pdf.nsf/lookup/sciman00.pdf/$file/sciman00.pdf), 2000.
A. Fink, J. Kosecoff, M. Chassin and R. Brook, Consensus methods: Characteristics and guidelines for use, American Journal of Public Health, vol. 74(9), pp. 979–983, 1984.
S Garfinkel, P. Farrell, V. Roussev and G Dinolt, Bringing science to digital forensics with standardized forensic corpora, Digital Investigation, vol. 6(S), pp. 2–11, 2009.
R. Hankins, T. Uehara and J. Liu, A comparative study of forensic science and computer forensics, Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on Secure Software Integration and Reliability Improvement, pp. 230–239, 2009.
J. Jones and D. Hunter, Qualitative research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research, British Medical Journal, vol. 311(7001), pp. 311–376, 1995.
K. Knorr, The nature of scientific consensus and the case of the social sciences, International Journal of Sociology, vol. 8(1/2), pp. 113–145, 1978.
R. Leigland and A. Krings, A formalization of digital forensics, International Journal of Digital Evidence, vol. 3(2), 2004.
E. Locard, The analysis of dust traces – Part I, American Journal of Police Science, vol. 1(3), pp. 276–298, 1930.
E. Locard, The analysis of dust traces – Part II, American Journal of Police Science, vol. 1(4), pp. 401–418, 1930.
E. Locard, The analysis of dust traces – Part III, American Journal of Police Science, vol. 1(5), pp. 496–514, 1930.
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Computer Forensics Tool Testing Program, Gaithersburg, Maryland (www.cftt.nist.gov).
National Research Council of the National Academies, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2009.
M. Pollitt, Applying traditional forensic taxonomy to digital forensics, in Advances in Digital Forensics IV, I. Ray and S. Shenoi (Eds.), Springer, Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 17–26, 2008.
K. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchins, London, United Kingdom, 1959.
Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence (SWGDE), Position on the National Research Council Report to Congress – Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward, Document 2009-09-17 (www.swgde.org/documents/current-documents), 2009.
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (DC Circuit), Frye v. United States, Federal Reporter, vol. 293, pp. 1013–1014, 1923.
U.S. Department of Justice, A Review of the FBI’s Handling of the Brandon Mayfield Case, Office of the Inspector General, Washington, DC (www.justice.gov/oig/special/s0601/exec.pdf), 2006.
U.S. Government, Federal rules of evidence, Title 28 – Judiciary and Judicial Procedure Appendix and Supplements, United States Code, 2006.
U.S. Supreme Court, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., United States Reports, vol. 509, pp. 579–601, 1983.
M. Zimmerman, The Consensus on the Consensus: An Opinion Survey of Earth Scientists on Global Climate Change, M.S. Thesis, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, 2008.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cohen, F., Lowrie, J., Preston, C. (2011). The State of the Science of Digital Evidence Examination. In: Peterson, G., Shenoi, S. (eds) Advances in Digital Forensics VII. DigitalForensics 2011. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 361. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24212-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24212-0_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24211-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24212-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)