A Sustainability Approach in Road Project Evaluation, Case-Study: Pollutant Emission and Accident Costs in Cost Benefit Analysis

  • Saeed Asadi BagloeeEmail author
  • Mohsen Asadi
  • Claire Bozic
Conference paper


Sustainability issues are often viewed as fancy topics that are interesting only to academia. It is necessary to bring such ideas into daily engineering practice through easy and straightforward methodologies. In this study we dealt with two aspects of sustainability in road project evaluation practices: pollutant emissions and losses associated with traffic accidents. In addition to the traditional costs and benefits associated with such projects, we propose a methodology to convert such sustainability impacts into currency units. This would enable conducting an apples-to-apples comparison when analyzing different projects. This was made possible by localizing some international research findings to reflect conditions where this case-study was undertaken.


Pollutant Emission Traffic Model Traffic Assignment Sustainability Approach Traffic Analysis Zone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    U.A.E., Abu Dhabi, DoT, Surface Transport Master Plan (STMP), (accessed by 2011)
  2. 2.
    U.A.E., Abu Dhabi, Urban Planning Council, (accessed by 2011)
  3. 3.
    U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, (accessed by 2011)
  4. 4.
    Encyclopedia of the Nations, Asia and Oceania, United Arab Emirates, IncomeGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Avec Sommer, H., Künzli, N., Seethaler, R., Chanel, O., Herry, M., Masson, S., Filliger, P., Horak, F., Kaiser, R., Medina, S., Puybonnieux-Texier, V., Quénel, P., Schneider, J., Studnicka, M.: Economic evaluation of health impacts due to road traffic-related air pollution: an impact assessment project of Austria, France, Switzerland. In: Dans Rapport de l’OCDE, Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation, pp. 451–480 (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    AEAT, Methodology for the Cost-Benefit Analysis for CAFE. Reports Prepared for the Clean Air for Europe Programme 1, 2, 3 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    RWDI, South Fraser Perimeter Road Regional Air Quality Assessment: Technical Volume 16 of the Environmental Assessment Application. BC Ministry of Transportation (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang, M.Q., Santini, D.J., Warinner, S.A.: Monetary Values of Air Pollutants in Various U.S. Regions. Transportation Research Record 1475, 33–41 (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Spiess, H.: Implementation of German air pollution model MLuS-92, EMME/2 Support (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    U.A.E., Abu Dhabi, DoT, Traffic Impact Study, Al Faya Truck road, Jacob consultant (2010) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Taylor, M.C., Baruya, A., Kennedy, J.V.: The relationship between speed and accidents on rural single-carriageway roads, TRL Reports, TRL511. Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boardman, E., Anthony, H., David, G., Vining, A.R., Weimer, D.L.: Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saeed Asadi Bagloee
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mohsen Asadi
    • 2
  • Claire Bozic
    • 3
  1. 1.ParsonsDubaiUAE
  2. 2.Tarbiat Moallem UniversityTehranIran
  3. 3.Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP)ChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations