Advertisement

Study on Emergency Services for VoIP Based on IP Network vs. Domestic Emergency Network

  • IlJin Lee
  • OkJo Jeong
  • ShinGak Kang
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 206)

Abstract

Enhanced 9-1-1 (E9-1-1) Service is a public safety feature that allows customers to report an emergency or request emergency assistance by dialing the 3-digit telephone number “9-1-1.” Emergency calls originated in this manner are then routed to the appropriate Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) based on the location from which the call was originated. In this paper, we are intended to analyze the structure of system to efficiently provide emergency service using SIP protocol-based internet telephone under IP network environment, and the assessment of its performance.

Keywords

VoIP Emergency services IP network 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    NENA, Interim VoIP Architecture for Enchanced 9-1-1 services (i2)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    NENA Functional and Interface Standards for Next Generation 9-1-1 Version 1.0 (i3), NENA (December 2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schulzrinne, H.: A Uniform Resource Name (URN) for Emergency and Other Well-Known Services. Internet Engineering Task Force, RFC 5031 (January 2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hardie, T., Newton, A., Schulzrinne, H., Tschofenig, H.: LoST: A Location-to-Service Translation Protocol. Internet Engineering Task Force, RFC 5222 (August 2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cueller, J., et al.: Geopriv Requirements. Internet Engineering Task Force, RFC 3693 (February 2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Peterson, J.: A Presence-based GEOPRIV Location Object Format. Internet Engineering Task Force, RFC 4119 (December 2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Winterbotton, J., Thomson, M., Tschofenig, H.: GEOPRIV PIDF-LO Usage Clarification, Considerations and Recommendations. Internet Engineering Task Force, draft-ietf-geopriv-pdif-lo-profile-13 (September 2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schulzrinne, H.: Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4 and DHCPv6) Option for Civic Addresses Configuration Information. Internet Engineering Task Force, RFC 4776 (November 2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thomson, M., Winterbottom, J., Andrew: Revised Civic Location Format for Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO). Internet Engineering Task Force, RFC 5139 (February 2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Requirements for a Location-by-Reference Mechanism. In: Marshall, R. (ed.) Internet Engineering Task Force, draft-ietf-geopriv-lbyr-requirements-03 (June 2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Winterbottom, J., Tschofenig, H., Schulzrinne, H., Thomson, M., Dawson, M.: An HTTPS Location Dereferencing Protocol Using HELD. Internet Engineering Task Force, draft-winterbottom-geopriv-deref-protocol-02 (July 2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • IlJin Lee
    • 1
  • OkJo Jeong
    • 1
  • ShinGak Kang
    • 1
  1. 1.Electronics and Communications Research InstituteDaejeonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations