A Continuous Learning in a Changing Environment

  • Aldo Franco Dragoni
  • Germano Vallesi
  • Paola Baldassarri
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6979)


We propose a Hybrid System for dynamic environments, where a “Multiple Neural Networks” system works with Bayes Rule to solve a face recognition problem. One or more neural nets may no longer be able to properly operate, due to partial changes in some of the characteristics of the individuals. For this purpose, we assume that each expert network has a reliability factor that can be dynamically re-evaluated on the ground of the global recognition operated by the overall group. Since the net’s degree of reliability is defined as the probability that the net is giving the desired output, in case of conflicts between the outputs of the various nets the re-evaluation of their degrees of reliability can be simply performed on the basis of the Bayes Rule. The new vector of reliability will be used to establish who is the conflict winner, making the final choice (the name of subject). Moreover the network disagreed with the group and specialized to recognize the changed characteristic of the subject will be retrained and then forced to correctly recognize the subject. Then the system is subjected to continuous learning.


Belief revision face recognition neural networks unsupervised learning hybrid system 


  1. 1.
    Azam, F.: Biologically inspired modular neural networks. PhD Dissertation, Virginia Tech. (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shields, M.W., Casey, M.C.: A theoretical framework for multiple neural network systems. Neurocomputing 71(7-9), 1462–1476 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sharkey, A.J.: Modularity combining and artificial neural nets. Connection Science 9(1), 3–10 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li, Y., Zhang, D.: Modular Neural Networks and Their Applications in Biometrics. Trends in Neural Computation 35, 337–365 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guo, H., Shi, W., Deng, Y.: Evaluating sensor reliability in classification problems based on evidence theory. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part B: Cybernetics 36(5), 970–981 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gardenfors, P.: Belief Revision. In: Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 29 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Benferhat, S., Cayrol, C., Dubois, D., Lang, J., Prade, H.: Inconsistency management and prioritized syntax-based entailment. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 640–645 (1993)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tolba, A.S., El-Baz, A.H., El-Harby, A.A.: Face Recognition a Literature Review. International Journal of Signal Processing 2, 88–103 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kohonen, T.: Learning vector quantization. In: Self Organizing Maps. Springer Series in Information Sciences, Berlin, vol. 30 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Philips, P.J., Wechsler, H., Huang, J., Rauss, P.: The FERET Database and Evaluation Procedure for Face-Recognition Algorithms. Images and Vision Computing Journal 16(5), 295–306 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aldo Franco Dragoni
    • 1
  • Germano Vallesi
    • 1
  • Paola Baldassarri
    • 1
  1. 1.DIIGAUniversitá Politecnica delle MarcheAnconaItalia

Personalised recommendations