Abstract
This study examines the influence of the social network of board interlocks on diversification strategy acknowledgement and implement. The author suggests both organizational level and individual level of interlocking directorate have an effect on board strategy decision through affecting the effects of strategy learning, and the empirical analysis proves it. Results that network density, centrality and the status of CEO Interlocks are positive related with the relationship between diversification strategy at the outside firm and the focal firm, while proportion of interlocking outside director plays negative influence. Finally, some conclusions are drawn and a discussion of future directions is given.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Granovetter, M.: Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology 91(3), 156–174 (1985)
Mizruchi, M.S.: Who Controls Whom? An Examination of the Relation Between Management and Board of Directors in Large American Corporations. Academy of Management Review 8, 426–435 (1983)
Duan, H., Zhong, W.: An Empirical Study on the Causes of Interlocking Directorates-Based on Listed Companies in Shanghai. Science of Science and Management of S. & T. 8, 156–161 (2008)
Lu, C.-c., Chen, S.-h., Joachim, S.: Theories of Interlocking Directorates: An Empirical Testing Based on the Listed Companies of China. China Industrial Economy 1, 113–119 (2006)
Geletkanycz, Hambrick: The External Ties of Top Executives: Implications for Strategic Choice and Performance. Administrative Quarterly 42, 654–681 (1997)
Pfeffer, Salancik: The External Control of Organizations. Harper, New York (1978)
Bigley, G., Wiersema, M.: New CEOs and Corporate Strategic Refocusing: How Experience as Heir Apparent Influences the Use of Power. Administrative Science Quarterly 47, 707–727 (2008)
Burt, R.: Structural Holes: the Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1992)
Hoffman, A., Stearns, T., Shrader, C.: Structure, context, and centrality in interorganizational networks. Journal of Business Research 20(4), 333–354 (1990)
Mintz, Schwartz: The Power Structure of American Business. U. of Chicago Press, Chicago (1985)
Finkelstein: Power in Top Management Teams: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation. Academy of Management Journal 35, 505–538 (1992)
Stokman, F.N., Van der Knoop, J., Wasseur, F.W.: Interlocks in the Netherlands: Stability and Careers in the Period 1960-1980. Soc. Netw. 10, 183–208 (1988)
Palepu, K.: Diversification Strategy, Profit Performance, and the Entropy Measure. Strategic Management Journal 6, 239–255 (1985)
Finkelstein, Sydney, Hambrick, D.C.: Top-management Team Tenure and Organizational Outcomes: the Moderating Role of Managerial Discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 484–503 (1992)
Freeman: Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks 1, 215–239 (1979)
Haunschild: Interorganizational Imitation: the Impact of Interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Administrative Science Quarterly 38, 564–592 (1993)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yang, Y., Cai, N. (2011). Interlocking Directorate and Firm’s Diversification Strategy: Perspective of Strategy Learning. In: Dai, M. (eds) Innovative Computing and Information. ICCIC 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 232. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23998-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23998-4_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23997-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23998-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)