Skip to main content

The Effect of Dynamic Computerized Scaffolding on Collaborative Discourse

  • Conference paper
Towards Ubiquitous Learning (EC-TEL 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6964))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper explores the effect of computerized scaffolding and different forms of scaffolds on small groups’ collaborative discourse. We developed a computerized scaffolding system that uses an attention management system to support metacognitive activities in small groups. We previously found that the scaffolding stimulates the group’ metacognitive activities and enhances individual metacognitive knowledge. Moreover different forms of scaffolds have differential effects on learning that cannot be explained by quantitative differences in the groups’ metacognitive activities. Therefore, we investigate to qualitative differences in the groups’ collaborative discourse in this study. We found that groups receiving scaffolding had significantly less ignored metacognitive episodes. Groups receiving problematizing scaffolds had significantly less ignored metacognitive episodes and more co-constructed metacognitive episodes compared to groups receiving structuring scaffolds. These findings indicate that scaffolding indeed positively influenced collaborative discourse and intensive collaborative discourse seems to explain the differential learning effects of different forms of scaffolds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Azevedo, R., Moos, D.C., Greene, J.A., Winters, F.I., Cromley, J.G.: Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research and Development 56(1), 45–72 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Azevedo, R., Hadwin, A.F.: Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition - implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science 33(5-6), 367–379 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. VanDerStel, M., Veenman, M.V.J.: Development of Metacognitive Skillfulness; a Longitudional Study. Learning and Individual Differences 20, 220–224 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J.G.: Does Training on Self-Regulated Learning Facilitate Students’ Learning With Hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology 96(3), 523–535 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chi, M.: Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities. Topics in Cognitive Science 1(1), 73–105 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Webb, M.: The teacher’s role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology 79, 1–28 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Molenaar, I., van Boxtel, C., Sleegers, P.J.C., Roda, C.: Attention management for Learning: Atgentschool. In: Roda, C. (ed.) Human Attention in Digital Environments, pp. 259–280. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Roda, C., Nabeth, T.: Supporting attention in learning environments: Attention support services, and information management. In: Duval, E., Klamma, R., Wolpers, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2007. LNCS, vol. 4753, pp. 277–291. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Reiser, B.J.: Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work. Journal of the Learning Sciences 13(3), 273–304 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., Fischer, F.: Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment. Learning and Instruction 17(4), 416–426 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barron, B.: When Smart Groups Fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 12(3), 307–359 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Molenaar, I., Van Boxtel, C., Sleegers, P. (2011). The Effect of Dynamic Computerized Scaffolding on Collaborative Discourse. In: Kloos, C.D., Gillet, D., Crespo García, R.M., Wild, F., Wolpers, M. (eds) Towards Ubiquitous Learning. EC-TEL 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6964. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23985-4_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23985-4_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23984-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23985-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics