Skip to main content

Qualitative Reasoning about Incomplete Categorization Rules Based on Interpolation and Extrapolation in Conceptual Spaces

  • Conference paper
Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6929))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Various forms of commonsense reasoning may be used to cope with situations where insufficient knowledge is available for a given purpose. In this paper, we rely on such a strategy to complete sets of symbolic categorization rules, starting from background information about the semantic relationship of different properties and concepts. Our solution is based on Gärdenfors conceptual spaces, which allow us to express semantic relationships with a geometric flavor. In particular, we take the inherently qualitative notion of betweenness as primitive, and show how it naturally leads to patterns of interpolative reasoning. Both a semantic and a syntactic characterization of this process is presented, and the computational complexity is analyzed. Finally, some patterns of extrapolative reasoning are sketched, based on the notions of betweenness and parallelism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Billen, R., Clementini, E.: Semantics of collinearity among regions. In: Chung, S., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM-WS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3762, pp. 1066–1076. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Collins, A., Michalski, R.: The logic of plausible reasoning: A core theory. Cognitive Science 13(1), 1–49 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dubois, D., Prade, H., Esteva, F., Garcia, P., Godo, L.: A logical approach to interpolation based on similarity relations. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 17(1), 1–36 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Dupin de Saint-Cyr, F., Lang, J.: Belief extrapolation (or how to reason about observations and unpredicted change). Artif. Intell. 175(2), 760–790 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Forbus, K.D.: Qualitative process theory. Artif. Intell. 24(1-3), 85–168 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gärdenfors, P.: Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gardenfors, P., Williams, M.: Reasoning about categories in conceptual spaces. In: Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 385–392 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gérard, R., Kaci, S., Prade, H.: Ranking alternatives on the basis of generic constraints and examples: a possibilistic approach. In: International Joint Conference on Artifical Intelligence, pp. 393–398 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kraus, S., Lehmann, D., Magidor, M.: Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics. Artificial Intelligence 44(1-2), 167–207 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuipers, B.: Qualitative simulation. Artificial Intelligence 29(3), 289–338 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Lehmann, F., Cohn, A.G.: The EGG/YOLK reliability hierarchy: semantic data integration using sorts with prototypes. In: Int. Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 272–279 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Prade, H., Schockaert, S.: Completing rule bases in symbolic domains by analogy making. In: 7th Conf. of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roy, B.: The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theory and Decision 31, 49–73 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Ruspini, E.: On the semantics of fuzzy logic. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 5, 45–88 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Schockaert, S., Prade, H.: An inconsistency-tolerant approach to information merging based on proposition relaxation. In: AAAI Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 363–368 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schockaert, S., Prade, H.: Interpolation and extrapolation in conceptual spaces: A case study in the music domain. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Web Reasoning and Rule Systems (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sun, R.: Robust reasoning: integrating rule-based and similarity-based reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 75(2), 241–295 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schockaert, S., Prade, H. (2011). Qualitative Reasoning about Incomplete Categorization Rules Based on Interpolation and Extrapolation in Conceptual Spaces. In: Benferhat, S., Grant, J. (eds) Scalable Uncertainty Management. SUM 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6929. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23963-2_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23963-2_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23962-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23963-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics