Abstract
The main problem of ethical decision-making in modern pluralistic societies is that consensus is hard to establish. Most of the relevant questions in the field of biomedicine, such as stem cell research, embryology, euthanasia and transplantation medicine, are highly controversial. At the same time, legal certainty often requires legislative action. Thus, the legislator appears obliged to act, but there are neither generally accepted moral rules that can be relied upon, nor can all-encompassing consensus be reached.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hagedorn, C. (2013). Summary. In: Legitime Strategien der Dissensbewältigung in demokratischen Staaten. Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht, vol 244. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23919-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23919-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23918-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23919-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)