Skip to main content

Product variety, flexibility and energy use in hot rolling mills

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 2388 Accesses

Abstract

Hot rolling consumes one third of the energy in a steel plant. Increasing product variety slows down production flow, causing heat losses and increased reheating energy consumption. A system dynamics model was developed to evaluate how flexibility influences energy use. Results indicate that world best practice requires high flexibility and low to intermediate product variety. Up to 28% less reheating was needed for low product variety, but no improvement was obtained for high product variety; a flexible steelmaking process for efficient production of small batches of steel would be required. The strategic nature of process flexibility investments is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Siitonen, S., Tuomaalaa, M., Ahtilaa, P. (2010): Variables affecting energy efficiency and CO2 emissions in the steel industry, Energy Policy, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 2477-2485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Worrell, E., Neelis, M., Price, L., Galitsky, C., Zhou, N. (2008): World best practice energy intensity values for selected industrial sectors, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, pp. 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Storck, J. (2009): Strategic and Operational Capabilities in Steel Production, Ph.D. thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Knoop, P., Van Nerom, L. (2003): Scheduling requirements for hot charge optimization in an integrated steel plant, in: Proceedings of IEEE Industry Applications Conference, Vol. 1, pp. 74-78.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baykasoğlu, A. (2009): Quantifying machine flexibility, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 47, No. 15, pp. 4109-4123.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. De Toni, A., Tonchia, S. (2005): Definitions and linkages between operational and strategic flexibilities, Omega, Vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 525-540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chryssolouris, G. (1996): Flexibility and its measurement, Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 581-587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hopp, W., Spearman, L. (2004): To pull or not to pull: What is the question?, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 133-145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Upton, D.M. (1995): Flexibility as process mobility, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 12, pp. 205-224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Slack, N. (1987): The flexibility of manufacturing systems, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 35-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Terkaj, W., Tolio, T., Valente, A. (2009): Focused flexibility in production systems, in: Changeable and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems, Ch. 3, pp. 47-66, H. ElMaraghy (ed), Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nye, T.J., Jewkes, E.M., Dilts, D.M. (2001): Optimal investment in setup time reduction in manufacturing systems with WIP inventories, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 135, No. 1, pp. 128-141.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Denton, B. Gupta, D., Jawahir, K. (2003): Managing increasing product variety at integrated steel mills, Interfaces, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 41-53.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mintzberg, H. (1985): Of strategies, deliberate and emergent, in Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 257-272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mourdoukoutas, P., Papadimitriou, S. (1998): Do Japanese companies have a competitive strategy?, in: European Business Review, Vol. 98, No. 4, pp. 227-234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Porter, M. (1996): What is strategy?, in Harvard Business Review, November-December, pp. 61-78.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shingo, S. (1985): Revolution in Manufacturing: The SMED system, Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Slack, N. (2005): The changing nature of operations flexibility, in: Int J of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 25, No. 12, pp. 1201-1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Storck, J. (2009): Product variety and upstream versus downstream flexibility, in Proceedings of the 3:rd Swedish Production Symposium, Göteborg, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Storck, J. (2012). Product variety, flexibility and energy use in hot rolling mills. In: ElMaraghy, H. (eds) Enabling Manufacturing Competitiveness and Economic Sustainability. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23860-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23860-4_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23859-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23860-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics