Abstract
Presidential elections are conducted as a multi-stage process, whose election rules are determined by the Constitution and Federal statutes. While some of these rules are clearly stated in these two sets of provisions, some other rules leave plenty of room for their interpretation. The unclear (fuzzy) election rules can be viewed, in fact, as constitutional puzzles, which can be definitively resolved only by the Supreme Court, by Congress (in cases in which Congress is authorized to address corresponding unclear issues), and by means of constitutional amendments. Moreover, the unclear election rules may contribute to emerging weird (or extreme) outcomes and election stalemates, which may cause frustration and disappointment in society.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Belenky, A.S. (2012). What if? Constitutional puzzles, weird outcomes, and possible stalemates in presidential elections. In: Understanding the Fundamentals of the U.S. Presidential Election System. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23819-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23819-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23818-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23819-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)