Abstract
Input devices are often evaluated in terms of their throughput, as measured by Fitts’ Law, and by their resolution. However, little effort has been made to understand the limit of resolution that is controllable or “usable” by the human using the device. What is the point of a 5000 dpi computer mouse if the human motor control system is far from being able to achieve this level of precision? This paper introduces the concept of a Device’s Human Resolution (DHR): the smallest target size that users can acquire with an ordinary amount of effort using one particular device. We report on our attempt to find the DHR through a target acquisition experiment involving very small target sizes. Three devices were tested: a gaming mouse (5700 dpi), a PHANTOM (450 dpi), and a free-space device (85 dpi). The results indicate a decrease in target acquisition performance that is not predicted by Fitts’ Law when target sizes become smaller than certain levels. In addition, the experiment shows that the actual achievable resolution varies greatly depending on the input device used, hence the need to include the “device” in the definition of DHR.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abate, F.R., Jewell, E. (eds.): The new Oxford American dictionary, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York (2005)
Albinsson, P.-A., Zhai, S.: High precision touch screen interaction. In: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 105–112. ACM, New York (2003)
Balakrishnan, R., MacKenzie, I.S.: Performance differences in the fingers, wrist, and forearm in computer input control. In: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 303–310. ACM, New York (1997)
Baudisch, P., Chu, G.: Back-of-device interaction allows creating very small touch devices. In: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 1923–1932. ACM, New York (2009)
Benko, H., Wilson, A.D., Baudisch, P.: Precise selection techniques for multi-touch screens. In: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 1263–1272. ACM, New York (2006)
Bérard, F., Ip, J., Benovoy, M., El-Shimy, D., Blum, J.R., Cooperstock, J.R.: Did “Minority Report” Get It Wrong? Superiority of the Mouse over 3D Input Devices in a 3D Placement Task. In: Gross, T., Gulliksen, J., Kotzé, P., Oestreicher, L., Palanque, P., Prates, R.O., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5727, pp. 400–414. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Blanch, R., Guiard, Y., Beaudouin-Lafon, M.: Semantic pointing: improving target acquisition with control-display ratio adaptation. In: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 519–526. ACM, New York (2004)
Card, S., Moran, T.P., Newell, A.: The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1983)
Casiez, G., Vogel, D., Balakrishnan, R., Cockburn, A.: The impact of control-display gain on user performance in pointing tasks. Human-Computer Interaction 23(3), 215–250 (2008)
Fitts, P.M.: The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 47(6), 381–391 (1954)
Guiard, Y., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Mottet, D.: Navigation as multiscale pointing: extending fitts’ model to very high precision tasks. In: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 450–457. ACM, New York (1999)
MacKenzie, I.S.: Fitts’ law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction 7, 91–139 (1992)
MacKenzie, I.S., Kauppinen, T., Silfverberg, M.: Accuracy measures for evaluating computer pointing devices. In: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 9–16. ACM, New York (2001)
Vogel, D., Baudisch, P.: Shift: a technique for operating pen-based interfaces using touch. In: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 657–666. ACM, New York (2007)
Yee, K.-P.: Peephole displays: pen interaction on spatially aware handheld computers. In: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 1–8. ACM, New York (2003)
Zhai, S.: Characterizing computer input with fitts’ law parameters–the information and non-information aspects of pointing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61(6), 791–809 (2004); Fitts’ law 50 years later: applications and contributions from human-computer interaction
Zhai, S., Milgram, P., Buxton, W.: The influence of muscle groups on performance of multiple degree-of-freedom input. In: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 308–315. ACM, New York (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bérard, F., Wang, G., Cooperstock, J.R. (2011). On the Limits of the Human Motor Control Precision: The Search for a Device’s Human Resolution. In: Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2011. INTERACT 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6947. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23771-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23771-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23770-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23771-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)