Advertisement

A Non-disruptive Technology for Robust 3D Tool Tracking for Ultrasound-Guided Interventions

  • Jay Mung
  • Francois Vignon
  • Ameet Jain
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6891)

Abstract

In the past decade ultrasound (US) has become the preferred modality for a number of interventional procedures, offering excellent soft tissue visualization. The main limitation however is limited visualization of surgical tools. A new method is proposed for robust 3D tracking and US image enhancement of surgical tools under US guidance. Small US sensors are mounted on existing surgical tools. As the imager emits acoustic energy, the electrical signal from the sensor is analyzed to reconstruct its 3D coordinates. These coordinates can then be used for 3D surgical navigation, similar to current day tracking systems. A system with real-time 3D tool tracking and image enhancement was implemented on a commercial ultrasound scanner and 3D probe. Extensive water tank experiments with a tracked 0.2mm sensor show robust performance in a wide range of imaging conditions and tool position/orientations. The 3D tracking accuracy was 0.36 ± 0.16mm throughout the imaging volume of 55° ×27° ×150mm. Additionally, the tool was successfully tracked inside a beating heart phantom. This paper proposes an image enhancement and tool tracking technology with sub-mm accuracy for US-guided interventions. The technology is non-disruptive, both in terms of existing clinical workflow and commercial considerations, showing promise for large scale clinical impact.

Keywords

Ultrasound Tool Tracking Interventions Navigation 

References

  1. 1.
    Chin, K.J., Perlas, A., Chan, V.W., Brull, R.: Needle Visualization in Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia: Challenges and Solutions. Reg. Anesth. Pain. Med. 33(6), 532–544 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    O’Flynn, E.A., Wilson, A.R., Michell, M.J., et al.: Image-Guided Breast Biopsy: State-of-the-Art. Clin. Radiol. 65(4), 259–270 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liveraghi, T.: Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Surg. Oncol. N. Am. 20(2), 281–299 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balzer, R., Kelm, M., Kühl, H.P.: Real-Time Three-Dimensional Transoesophageal Echocardiography for Guidance of non-Coronary Interventions in the Catheter Laboratory. Eur. J. Echocardiogr. 10(3), 341–349 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nichols, K., Wright, L.B., Spencer, T., Culp, W.C.: Changes in Ultrasonographic Echogenicity and Visibility of Needles with Changes in Angles of Insonation. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 14(12), 1553–1557 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Cheung, S., Rohling, R.: Enhancement of Needle Visibility in Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Procedures. Ultr. Med. Biol. 30(5), 617–624 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sonosite Needle Visualization, http://www.sonosite.com/needlevisualization/
  9. 9.
    Idriss, S.F., Fronheiser, M.P.: Vibrating Interventional Device Detection Using Real-Time 3-D Color Doppler. IEEE Trans. Ultr. Ferr. Freq. Contr. 55(6), 1355–1362 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Breyer, B., Cikes, I.: Ultrasonically marked catheter-a method for positive echographic catheter position identification. Med. Biol. Eng. Comp. 22(3), 268–271 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Perrella, R.R., Kimme-Smith, C., Tessler, F.N., Ragavendra, N., Grant, E.G.: A new electronically enhanced biopsy system: value in improving needle-tip visibility during sonographically guided procedures. Am. J. Roentgenol. 158(1) (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vilkomerson, D., Lyons, D.: A system for ultrasonic beacon-guidance of catheters and other minimally-invasive medical devices. IEEE Trans. UFFC 44(2), 496–504 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Menz, V., Vilkomerson, D., Ren, J.F., Michele, J.J., Schwartzman, D.: Echocardiographic Transponder-Guided Catheter Ablation Feasibility and Accuracy. J. Interv. Card. Electrophysiol. 5(2), 203–209 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Merdes, C.L., Wolf, P.D.: Locating a catheter transducer in a three-dimensional ultrasound imaging field. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 48(12), 1444–1452 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mung, J., Han, S., Yen, J.T., et al.: Design and in vitro evaluation of a real-time catheter localization system using time of flight measurements from seven 3.5 MHz single element ultrasound transducers towards abdominal aortic aneurysm procedures. Ultrasonics 51(6), 768–775 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Meyer, S.A., Wolf, P.D., et al.: Application of Sonomicrometry and Multidimensional Scaling to Cardiac Catheter Tracking. IEEE Trans. on Biomed. Eng. 44(11), 1061–1067 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jay Mung
    • 1
  • Francois Vignon
    • 2
  • Ameet Jain
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Southern CaliforniaUSA
  2. 2.Philips Research North AmericaUSA

Personalised recommendations