Skip to main content

Outlook: Is the Universe a Computer?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Universe as Automaton

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Complexity ((BRIEFSCOMPLEXITY))

  • 1323 Accesses

Abstract

 To answer this question, a deeper analysis of our cosmological models is necessary. In general, principles of symmetry play a central role in physics. The invariance and covariance properties of a system under specific symmetry transformations can either be related to the conservation laws of physics or be capable of establishing the structure of the fundamental physical interactions and forces. This is the most essential aspect of symmetry because it concerns the basic invariance principles of physics and the interactions themselves, and not just the properties of geometric figures (Mainzer 1996).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In quantum physics, all the properties of a system can be derived from the state or wave function associated with that system. Formally, a phase transformation of the wave function ψ(x, t) can be written as \( \psi(x,t) \to \psi^{\prime} (x,t) = e^{i\alpha} {\psi} (x,t) \) where α is the parameter (or phase) of the transformation (Mainzer 2005b). If α is constant, i.e., the same for all points in space–time, the equation expresses the fact that once a phase convention has been made at a given point in space–time, the same convention must be adopted at all other points. This is an example of a global transformation applied to the field ψ(x, t). If α = α(x, t) is a function of space and time, then such a transformation will not leave any equation of ψ(x, t) with space or time derivatives as invariant. This is, in particular, true for the Schrödinger equation or any relativistic wave equation for a free particle. To satisfy the invariance under a local phase transformation it is necessary to modify the equations in some way, which will no longer describe a free particle. Such modifications introduce additional terms, which describe the interaction of the particle with external fields and thereby generate the dynamics. That is the gauge principle or principle of local symmetry, according to which the interactions are determined by invariance under local symmetry (phase or gauge) transformations (Frampton 2008).

References

  • J. Audretsch, K. Mainzer (eds.), Wieviele Leben hat Schrödingers Katze? Zur Physik und Philosophie der Quantenmechanik, 2nd edn. (Spektrum Akademischer, Verlag, Heidelberg, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • L.O. Chua, CNN: A Paradigm for Complexity (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Deutsch, Quantum Theory, the Church-Turing Principle and the Universal Quantum Computer, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 400, 97–117 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • P.H. Frampton, Gauge Field Theories, 3rd edn. (Wiley-VCH, New York, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Giles, C. Thorn, Lattice approach to string theory. Phys. Rev. D 16, 366 (1977)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • J. Goldstone, Field theories with ‘superconductor’ solutions. N. Cimento 19, 154–164 (1961)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • S.W. Hawking, J.B. Hartle, T. Hertog, The no-boundary measure of the universe. Phys. Rev. Lett 100, 201301 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • P.W. Higgs, Broken symmetries, massless particles, and gauge fields. Phys. Lett. 12, 132–133 (1964)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • A.G. Hoekstra, J. Kroc, P.M.A. Sloot (eds.), Simulating Complex Systems by Cellular Automata (Springer, Berlin, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Mainzer, Symmetries of Nature (De Gruyter, New York, 1996) (German 1988: Symmetrien der Natur. De Gruyter: Berlin)

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Mainzer, Symmetry and Complexity: The Spirit and Beauty of Nonlinear Science (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005a)

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Mainzer, Symmetry and complexity in dynamical systems. Eur. Rev. Acad. Eur. 13, 29–48 (2005b)

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Mainzer, Thinking in Complexity. The Computational Dynamics of Matter, Mind, and Mankind (Springer, Berlin, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. McGuigan, Quantum cellular automata from lattice field theories (2003), http://arxiv.org/ftp/quant-ph/papers/0307/0307176.pdf

  • G. ‘t Hooft, K. Isler, S. Kalitzin, Quantum field theoretic behavior of a deterministic cellular automaton. Nucl. Phys. B 386, 495 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Mainzer .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Klaus Mainzer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mainzer, K., Chua, L. (2012). Outlook: Is the Universe a Computer?. In: The Universe as Automaton. SpringerBriefs in Complexity. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23477-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23477-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23476-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23477-4

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics