Skip to main content

Enterprise Coherence Assessment Version

  • Conference paper
Practice-Driven Research on Enterprise Transformation (PRET 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 89))

Abstract

In this paper, the authors discuss an instrument for the assessment of enterprise coherence (Enterprise Coherence Assessment, ECA). The term ‘coherence’ is used rather than the more common term ‘alignment’, since the latter is generally associated with bringing two concepts in line (typically ‘Business’ and ‘IT’). The word coherence, however, stresses the need to go beyond this. Coherence involves connections and synchronisation between all important aspects of an enterprise. ‘IT’ and ‘Business’ just being two of these aspects.

The ECA instrument was developed as part of the ongoing GEA (General Enterprise Architecting) research programme, and has so far been applied in seven large Dutch organisations. The paper discusses the context in which the ECA instrument was developed, the instrument itself, as well as the results of the assessment study in which the instrument was applied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. GEA Groeiplatform (in Dutch)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Enterprise architecture maturity model version 1.3. Technical report, National Association of State Chief Information Officers (NASCIO), United States of America (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lessen uit ICT-projecten bij de overheid, Deel B. De Algemene Rekenkamer (2008) (in Dutch)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Abcouwer, A., Maes, R., Truijens, J.: Contouren van een generiek model voor informatiemanagement. Primavera working paper, Universiteit van Amsterdam (1997) (in Dutch)

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Caluwé, L., Vermaak, H.: Learning to Change: A Guide for Organization Change Agents. Sage publications, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Department of Commerce, Government of the USA. Introduction - IT Architecture Capability Maturity Model. Government of the United States of America (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N.: Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal 32(1), 4–16 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoogervorst, J.A.P.: Enterprise Architecture: Enabling Integration, Agility and Change. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 13(3), 213–233 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoogervorst, J.A.P.: Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Iacob, M.-E., Jonkers, H., Lankhorst, M.M., Proper, H.A.: ArchiMate 1.0 Specification. The Open Group (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lankhorst, M.M., et al.: Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication and Analysis. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lugtigheid, R.B.: Architectuur bij PGGM; een praktijkvoorbeeld. Technical report, Ordina (2007) (in Dutch)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners. Hueber, 2nd edition (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Op’t Land, M., Proper, H.A., Waage, M., Cloo, J., Steghuis, C.: Enterprise Architecture – Creating Value by Informed Governance. Enterprise Engineering Series. Springer, Berlin (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pettigrew, A., Thomas, H., Whittington, R.: Handbook of Strategy & Management. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Project Management Body of Knowledge. Technical report, The Project Management Institute (November 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2. The Stationery Office (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. van der Raadt, B., Slot, R., Van Vliet, H.: Experience Report: Assessing a Global Financial Services Company on its Enterprise Architecture Effectiveness Using NAOMI, p. 218b (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schekkerman, J.: How to Survive in the Jungle of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks: Creating or Choosing an Enterprise Architecture Framework. Trafford Publishing, Victoria (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schnelle, E.: Neue Wege der Kommunikation. Spielregeln, Arbeitstechniken und Anwendungsfälle der Metaplan-Methode. Number Heft 10. Hanstein, Königstein/Taunus, Germany (1978) (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Slot, R.G.: A method for Valuing Architecture-Based Business Transformation and Measuring the value of Solutions Architecture. PhD thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Smit, R.: Manieren om strategie te verknallen. Financieel Dagblad (February 23, 2007) (in Dutch)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sowa, J.F., Zachman, J.A.: Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal 31(3), 590–616 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. The Open Group – TOGAF Version 9. Van Haren Publishing, Zaltbommel, The Netherlands (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Van Dale Groot woordenboek van de Nederlandse taal. Van Dale, 14th ed. (2010) (in Dutch)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Van’t Wout, J., Waage, M., Hartman, H., Stahlecker, M., Hofman, A.: The Integrated Architecture Framework Explained. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Wagter, R.: Sturen op samenhang op basis van GEA – Permanent en event driven. Van Haren Publishing, Zaltbommel (2009) (in Dutch)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wagter, R., Nijkamp, G., Proper, H.A.: Overview 1th Phase - General Enterprise Architecturing. White Paper GEA-1, Ordina, Utrecht, The Netherlands (2007) (in Dutch)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wagter, R., Van den Berg, M., Luijpers, J., Van Steenbergen, M.: Dynamic Enterprise Architecture: How to Make It Work. Wiley, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research – Design and Methods, 4th edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wagter, R., Proper, H.A.(., Witte, D. (2011). Enterprise Coherence Assessment Version. In: Harmsen, F., Grahlmann, K., Proper, E. (eds) Practice-Driven Research on Enterprise Transformation. PRET 2011. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 89. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23388-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23388-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23387-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23388-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics