Abstract
High-precision measurement of corporate governance efficiency provided valid benchmark and decision-making foundation for improving governance efficiency. Key factors were extracted from a variety of factors of influence governance efficiency, and they were unified dimensional processing using extension element transformation theory. Measurement model of corporate governance efficiency was constructed by extension set theory and the extension matrix theory. The method is effective and feasible through application demonstrates, also it resolves the uniform dimensional measurement and consistency of judgment matrix of the governance efficiency effectively, and can be widely applied in governance efficiency measurement of the same corporate or different corporate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Chang, J.E., Jiang, T.L.: Research on the Weight of Coefficient through Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology 29(1), 153–155 (2007)
Fan, C.Y., Han, X.M., Tang, W.H.: The Extract of Expert Judging Information and the Integral Method of Target Scaling in AHP. Journal of Air Force Engineering University (Natural Science Edition) 4(1), 49–56 (2003)
He, F., Chen, R., He, L.C.: The Measurement of Chinese Technical Efficiency: The Application of Stochastic Frontier Production Function. Systems Engineering-theory & Practice 14(5), 46–50 (2004)
John, C.S., Tang, I.N.: Sector priority and technology choice in the Korean machinery industry. International Journal of Technology Governance 8(3/4/5), 333–341 (1993)
Hou, Q., Shen, Y.Z.: The Choosing of Supplier Based on Extension Judgment Theory. Sci/tech Information Development & Economy 15(4), 156–158 (2005)
Huo, Y.B., Han, Z.J.: Research on Giving Weight for Multi-indicator Based on GME Principle And GA. Application of Statistics and governance 24(3), 39–50 (2005)
Labudda, K.D.: Fuzzy Multi-objective Approach to Power System State Estimation. International Journal of Engineering Intelligent Systems for Electrical Engineering and Communications 2(2), 83–91 (1994)
Li, G.J., Yan, H.: DEA Model for Measuring Input-and-output-based Technical Efficiency. Systems Engineering Theory & Practice 1(1), 26–32 (2002)
Lu, L.P., Wang, S.F.: Application of Fuzzy Hierarchy Method in Urban Intersection Evaluation. Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology 29(3), 286–288 (2006)
Lycurgus, L.L.: The Future Impact of Technology in the Greek Health Sector. International Journal of Healthcare Technology and governance 1(3/4), 409–414 (1999)
Nbrphy, C.K.: Combining Belief Functions When Evidence Conflicts. Decision Support Systems 29(1), 19–24 (2000)
Qureshi, M.N.: Framework for Benchmarking Logistics Performance Using Fuzzy AHP. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modeling 1(1), 82–98 (2009)
Pang, F.H., et al.: Evaluation of Water Quality by Standard Deviation Weight Fuzzy Assessment on Water Source Area in Middle Line Project of Transferring Water from South to North. Journal of Northwest A & F University(Natural Science Edition) 36(2), 229–234 (2008)
Peng, G.F., Li, S.H., Sheng, M.K.: AHP in Evaluating Government Performance: Determining Indicator Weight. China Soft Science (6), 136–139 (2004)
Pentti, M.: Environmental Problems of Modern Societies. International Journal of Technology governance 2(2), 263–278 (1987)
Philipp, A., Peter, R.: Acceptance of Modern Biotechnology in Developing Countries: a case study of the Philippines. International Journal of Biotechnology 2(1/2/3), 115–131 (2000)
Prasanta, K.D., et al.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making Approach to Petroleum Pipeline Route Selection. International Journal of Services Technology and governance 2(3/4), 347–362 (2001)
Ruggiero, J.: Measuring technical efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research (121), 138–150 (2000)
Samanta, B., Roy, T.K.: Multi-objective entropy transportation model with trapezoidal fuzzy number penalties, sources, and destinations. Journal of Transportation Engineering 131(6), 419–420 (2005)
Shuiabi, E., Thomoson, V., Bhuiyan, N.: Entropy as a Measure of Operational Flexibility. European Journal of Operational Research 165(3), 696–707 (2005)
Thierry, G.: Public Research Industry relationships: Efficiency Conditions in Current Innovation. International Journal of Technology governance 17(3), 334–350 (1999)
Wang, G.H., Liang, L.: Deriving Information from Judgment Matrix and Regulating It According as Consistent Rule. Systems Enging-theory Methodology Application 10(1), 68–71 (2001)
Zhang, C., Zhu, W.D., Yang, S.L.: The Chinese Commercial Bank’s Operational Risk Measurement Model on Entropy. Forecasting 26(5), 55–58 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
An, X., Zeming, F. (2011). Measuring Governance Efficiency of Corporate Using Extension Mathematical Theory. In: Zeng, D. (eds) Applied Informatics and Communication. ICAIC 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 225. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23220-6_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23220-6_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23219-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23220-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)