Advertisement

Differentiated Reliability Pricing Model for Customers of Distribution Grids

  • Arturas Klementavicius
  • Virginijus Radziukynas
Chapter
Part of the Energy Systems book series (ENERGY)

Abstract

The paper addresses the idea of reliability differentiation for peer electricity customers willing to choose a standardized reliability level of electricity supply for the respective tariff.

The authors suggest the reliability differentiation concept based on standardized reliability levels (categories). As a partial prototype, the existing 3-grade reliability differentiation system in Lithuania is referred to. According to the concept, customers with higher reliability category pay a higher distribution reliability tariff, in proportion to the incurred grid operation, management and amortization cost.

The operator provides a contracted higher category mainly through the parallel supply path in the grid, i.e. by the switch-over of customer’s load to the 2nd independent supply point after the failure of electrical path from the 1st independent supply point. Accordingly, the supply notion is split to major, joint and reserving supply where major supply for a customer is provided in normal operation situations (i.e. from the 1st independent supply point), reserving supply – in unusual situations (from 2nd independent supply point) while joint supply denotes situation when the same electrical path serves as both a major supply route for one customer and a reserve supply route for another.

The suggested concept is supported by a new mathematical reliability pricing model for 2-grade reliability system. The model is cost-reflective and applicable to the distribution grid area controlled by one operator. Its rationale is fair allocation of grid cost between customer groups with different reliability categories, and subsequent derivation of distribution tariffs for reliability categories. The grid cost is split to the components related to four types of grid equipment – distribution transformers, medium voltage lines, local transformers and low voltage lines. These cost components are allocated between customer classes with different reliability categories and connection-to-grid voltages. An allocation criterion is the scope of usage of grid equipment type.

The applicability of the presented model is illustrated by numerical setup for the sample grid.

Keywords

Customers Distribution grid Pricing model Reliability Supply 

References

  1. 1.
    Glachant JM, Lévêque F (2009) Electricity reform in Europe: towards a single energy market. Edward Elgar Publishing, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rau NS, Hegazy Y (1990) Reliability differentiated pricing of electricity service. NRRI series, 90–5. National Regulatory Research Institute, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barot H, Bhattacharya K (2010) Load service probability differentiated nodal pricing in power systems. IET Gen Transm Distrib 4(3):333–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hegazy Y, Guldmann JM (1996) Reliability pricing of electric power service: a probabilistic production cost modeling approach. Energy 21(2):87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Siddiqi SN, Baughman ML (1993) Reliability differentiated real-time pricing of electricity. IEEE Trans Power Syst 8(2):548–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chung KH, Kim BH, Hur D, Park JK (2005) Transmission reliability cost allocation method based on market participants’ reliability contribution factors. Electr Power Syst Res 73(1):31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hur D, Parka JK, Leeb WG, Kim BH, Chunb YH (2004) An alternative method for the reliability differentiated transmission pricing. Electr Power Syst Res 68(1):11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Woo ChK, Horowitz I, Martin J (1998) Reliability differentiation of electricity transmission. J Regul Econ 13(3):277–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sugihara H, Kita H, Hasegawa J, Nishiya K (1999) An evaluation of reliability differentiated supply system considering local characteristics. Trans Inst Elect Eng Jpn B 119-B(3):354–361, in JapaneseGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gonzalez-Cabrera N, Gutierrez-Alcaraz G (2010) Pricing reliability service based on end-users choice. In: 11th IEEE international conference on probabilistic methods applied to power systems (PMAPS), Singapore, 14–17 June 2010, pp 24–29Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wolf G (2007) Technologies advance transmission system. Transmission and distribution world, 4–10 Nov 2007 (in special supplement Digital Transmission)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Council of European Energy Regulators (2005) Third benchmarking report on quality of electricity supply. Ref: C05-QOS-01-03, Brussels, 2005Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    CIGRE (International Council on Large Electric Systems) (2004) Power quality indices and objectives. Report 2004, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    The European Commission, Directorate-General for Research (2006) European smart grids technology platform: vision and strategy for Europe’s electricity networks of the future, Luxembourg 2006Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Klementavicius A (2008) Customer reliability categories as the tool to improve electricity delivery in Lithuania. In: 8th international conference control of power systems’08, Strbske Pleso, 11–13 June 2008, pp 1–10Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arturas Klementavicius
    • 1
  • Virginijus Radziukynas
    • 1
  1. 1.Lithuanian Energy InstituteKaunasLithuania

Personalised recommendations