Advertisement

Investment Timing, Capacity Sizing, and Technology Choice of Power Plants

  • Ryuta Takashima
  • Afzal S. Siddiqui
  • Shoji Nakada
Chapter
Part of the Energy Systems book series (ENERGY)

Abstract

Deregulation of electricity industries has created wholesale markets with uncertain prices and offered greater flexibility to investors to make decisions. In this chapter, we consider the problem of a typical investor who has discretion over not only the timing, but also the sizing of a new power plant. The interaction between these two types of managerial flexibility may be addressed analytically using the real options approach. Since an investor may also have discretion over technology choice, we allow for an investment opportunity in two mutually exclusive projects with embedded timing and sizing options. Via numerical examples, we illustrate how an investor may make decisions about timing, sizing, and technology choice. Sensitivity analyses to key parameters also highlight the intuition for how decisions are made.

Keywords

Electricity price natural gas-fired power nuclear power optimal investment decision real options technology choice 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank two anonymous referees for providing valuable comments.

References

  1. 1.
    Wilson RB (1998) Architecture of power markets. Econometrica 70:1299–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hyman LS (2009) Restructuring electricity policy and financial models. Energy Econ, 32(4):751–757Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dixit AK, Pindyck RS (1994) Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McDonald R, Siegel D (1986) The value of waiting to invest. Q J Econ 101:707–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ekern S (1988) An option pricing approach to evaluating petroleum projects. Energy Econ 10:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deng S-J, Johnson B, Sogomonian A (2001) Exotic electricity options and the valuation of electricity and generation assets. Decis Support Syst 30:383–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tseng C-L, Barz G (2002) Short-term generation asset valuation: a real options approach. Oper Res 50:297–310MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deng S-J, Oren SS (2003) Incorporating operational characteristics and startup costs in option-based valuation of power generation capacity. Probability Eng Informational Sci 17:155–181MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rothwell G (2006) A real options approach to evaluating new nuclear power plants. Energy J 27:37–53Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gollier C, Proult D, Thais F, Walgenwitz G (2005) Choice of nuclear power investments under price uncertainty: valuing modularity. Energy Econ 27:667–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Näsäkkälä E, Fleten S-E (2005) Flexibility and technology choice in gas fired power plant investments. Rev Financ Econ 14:371–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Siddiqui AS, Maribu K (2009) Investment and upgrade in distributed generation under uncertainty. Energy Econ 31:25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bøckman T, Fleten S-E, Juliussen E, Langhammer H, Revdal J (2008) Investment timing and optimal capacity choice for small hydropower projects. Eur J Oper Res 190:255–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Takashima R, Naito Y, Kimura H, Madarame H (2007) Decommissioning and equipment replacement of nuclear power plants under uncertainty. J Nucl Sci Technol 44:1347–1355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Décamps J-P, Mariotti T, Villeneuve S (2006) Irreversible investment in alternative projects. Econ Theory 28:425–448CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huisman KJM, Kort PM (2003) Strategic investment in technological innovations. Eur J Oper Res 144:209–233MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fleten S-E, Maribu KM, Wangensteen I (2007) Optimal investment strategies in decentralized renewable power generation under uncertainty. Energy 32:803–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wickart M, Madlener R (2007) Optimal technology choice and investment timing: a stochastic model of industrial cogeneration vs. heat-only production. Energy Econ 29:934–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Takashima R, Goto M, Kimura H, Madarame H (2008) Entry into the electricity market: uncertainty, competition, and mothballing options. Energy Econ 30:1809–1830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dangl T (1999) Investment and capacity choice under uncertain demand. Eur J Oper Res 117:415–428CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bar-Ilan A, Strange WC (1996) Investment lags. Am Econ Rev 86(3):610–622 A real-options approach. Rev Financ Stud 16:1239–1272Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sauma EE, Oren SS (2006) Proactive planning and valuation of transmission investments in restructured electricity markets. J Regul Econ 30:261–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryuta Takashima
    • 1
  • Afzal S. Siddiqui
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shoji Nakada
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Risk Science in Finance and ManagementChiba Institute of TechnologyChibaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Statistical ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of Nuclear Engineering and ManagementThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations