Refining Process Models through the Analysis of Informal Work Practice
The work presented in this paper explores the potential of leveraging the traces of informal work and collaboration in order to improve business processes over time. As process executions often differ from the original design due to individual preferences, skills or competencies and exceptions, we propose methods to analyse personal preferences of work, such as email communication and personal task execution in a task management application. Outcome of these methods is the detection of internal substructures (subtasks or branches) of activities on the one hand and the recommendation of resources to be used in activities on the other hand, leading to the improvement of business process models. Our first results show that even though human intervention is still required to operationalise these insights it is indeed possible to derive interesting and new insights about business processes from traces of informal work and infer suggestions for process model changes.
KeywordsBusiness Process Business Process Model Process Instance Informal Work Task Instance
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Agrawal, R., Gunopulos, D., Leymann, F.: Mining process models from workflow logs. In: Schek, H.-J., Alonso, G., Saltor, F., Ramos, I. (eds.) EDBT 1998. LNCS, vol. 1377, pp. 469–483. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)Google Scholar
- 4.Biemann, C., Quasthoff, U., Heyer, G., Holz, F.: ASV Toolbox – A Modular Collection of Language Exploration Tools. In: 6th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, LREC (2008)Google Scholar
- 5.Brander, S., Hinkelmann, K., Martin, A., Thönssen, B.: Mining of agile business processes. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on AI for Business Agility (2011)Google Scholar
- 6.Carvalho, V.R., Cohen, W.W.: Recommending Recipients in the Enron Email Corpus. Technical Report CMU-LTI-07-005, Carnegie Mellon University, Language Technologies Institute (2007)Google Scholar
- 7.Di Ciccio, C., Macella, M., Scannapieco, M., Zardetto, D., Cartacci, T.: Groupware Mail Messages Analysis for Mining Collaborative Processes. Technical report, Sapienza, Università di Roma (2011)Google Scholar
- 10.Feldkamp, D., Hinkelmann, K., Thönssen, B.: KISS: Knowledge-Intensive Service Support: An Approach for Agile Process Management, pp. 25–38 (2007)Google Scholar
- 11.International Organization for Standardization. ISO Survey 2009, http://www.iso.org/iso/survey2009.pdf (accessed in March 2011)
- 12.Hinkelmann, K., Merelli, E., Thönssen, B.: The role of content and context in enterprise repositories. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Advanced Enterprise Architecture and Repositories-AER (2010)Google Scholar
- 13.Martin, A., Brun, R.: Agile Process Execution with KISSmir. In: 5th International Workshop on Semantic Business Process Management (2010)Google Scholar
- 14.McDauley, D.: In the face of increasing global competition and rapid changes in technology, legislation, and knowledge, organizations need to overcome inertia and become agile enough to respond quickly. Organizational agility might indeed be one. In: Swenson, K.D. (ed.) Mastering the Unpredictable: How Adaptive Case Management Will Revolutionize the Way That Knowledge Workers Get Things Done, pp. 257–275. Meghan-Kiffer Press (2010)Google Scholar
- 15.Nikolov, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: EMailAnalyzer: An E-Mail Mining Plug-in for the ProM Framework (2007)Google Scholar