Abstract
The theory of reciprocity is one of main topics of behavioral economics and experimental economics in recent several decades. However, lost wallet game proposed by Dufwenberg and Gneezy in 2000 indicated that the reward behavior of wallet owner and the size of the outside option the wallet picker forgone are uncorrelated or weakly correlated. Servátka and Vadovič (2009) and Cox et al (2010) were trying to use the inequality of outside option and the saliency of outside option to the wallet loser to shed some light on the puzzle of lost wallet game, but their experiments hasn’t solved the asymmetry between the wallet loser’s reward behavior y and the outside option the wallet picker forgone. Therefore, the lost wallet game is still an open puzzle.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Rabin, M.: Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. American Economic Review 83(5), 1281–1302 (1993)
Fehr, E., Schmidt, K.M.: A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(3), 817–868 (1999)
Bolton, G.E., Ockenfels, A.: ERC: a theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review 90(1), 166–193 (2000)
Charness, G., Rabin, M.: Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(3), 817–869 (2002)
Li, X., Li, J.: Reciprocity, trust and efficiency of governance. Nankia Economic Research 1, 101–121 (2009)
Guth, W., Schmittberger, R., Schwarze, B.: An experimental analysis of ultimatium bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3(4), 367–388 (1982)
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., McCabe, K.: Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior 10(1), 122–142 (1995)
Abbink, K., Irlenbusch, B., Renner, E.: The moonlighting game. Journal Economics Behaviror and Organization 42(2), 265–277 (2000)
Falk, A., Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U.: Testing theories of fairness—Intentions matter. Game and Economics and Behavior 62(1), 287–304 (2008)
Fehr, E., Kirchsteiger, G., Riedl, A.: Does fairness prevent market clearing? An experimental investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(2), 437–459 (1993)
Fehr, E., Gachter, S., Kirchsteiger, G.: Reciprocity as a Contract Enforcement Device: Experimental Evidence. Econometrica 65(4), 833–860 (1997)
Dufwenberg, M., Gneezy, U.: Measuring beliefs in an experimental lost wallet game. Games and Economic Behavior 30(2), 163–182 (2000)
Brandts, J., Güth, W., Stiehler, A.: I Want YOU! An experiment studying motivational effects when assigning distributive power. Labour Economics 13(1), 1–17 (2006)
Charness, G., Haruvy, E., Sonsino, D.: Social distance and reciprocity: an internet experiment. Journal of Economics Behavior and Organization 63(1), 88–103 (2007)
Servátka, M., Vadovič, R.: Unequal outside options in the lost wallet game. Economics Bulletin 29(4), 2870–2883 (2009)
Battigalli, P., Dufwenberg, M.: Dynamic psychological games. Journal of Economic Theory 144(1), 1–35 (2009)
Cox, J., Servátka, M., Vadovič, R.: Saliency of outside options in the lost wallet game. Experimental Economics 13(1), 66–74 (2010)
Selten, R.: Die Strategiemethode zur Erforschung des eingeschränkt rationalen Verhaltens im Rahmen eines Oligopolexperiments. In: Sauermann, H. (ed.) Beiträge zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung, pp. 136–168. Mohr, Tübingen (1967)
Brandts, J., Charness, G.: The strategy verse the direct-response method: a survey of experimental comparisons, Working papers (2010)
Casari, M., Cason, T.: The strategy method lowers measured trustworthy behavior. Economics Letters 103(3), 157–159
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Li, J., Zhao, Y. (2011). The Puzzle of Lost Wallet Game: Challenge of Reciprocity Theory. In: Zhou, Q. (eds) Applied Economics, Business and Development. ISAEBD 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 208. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23023-3_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23023-3_34
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23022-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23023-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)