Skip to main content

The Puzzle of Lost Wallet Game: Challenge of Reciprocity Theory

  • Conference paper
Applied Economics, Business and Development (ISAEBD 2011)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 208))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3184 Accesses

Abstract

The theory of reciprocity is one of main topics of behavioral economics and experimental economics in recent several decades. However, lost wallet game proposed by Dufwenberg and Gneezy in 2000 indicated that the reward behavior of wallet owner and the size of the outside option the wallet picker forgone are uncorrelated or weakly correlated. Servátka and Vadovič (2009) and Cox et al (2010) were trying to use the inequality of outside option and the saliency of outside option to the wallet loser to shed some light on the puzzle of lost wallet game, but their experiments hasn’t solved the asymmetry between the wallet loser’s reward behavior y and the outside option the wallet picker forgone. Therefore, the lost wallet game is still an open puzzle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rabin, M.: Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. American Economic Review 83(5), 1281–1302 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fehr, E., Schmidt, K.M.: A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(3), 817–868 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bolton, G.E., Ockenfels, A.: ERC: a theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review 90(1), 166–193 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Charness, G., Rabin, M.: Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(3), 817–869 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, X., Li, J.: Reciprocity, trust and efficiency of governance. Nankia Economic Research 1, 101–121 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guth, W., Schmittberger, R., Schwarze, B.: An experimental analysis of ultimatium bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3(4), 367–388 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., McCabe, K.: Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior 10(1), 122–142 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Abbink, K., Irlenbusch, B., Renner, E.: The moonlighting game. Journal Economics Behaviror and Organization 42(2), 265–277 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Falk, A., Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U.: Testing theories of fairness—Intentions matter. Game and Economics and Behavior 62(1), 287–304 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Fehr, E., Kirchsteiger, G., Riedl, A.: Does fairness prevent market clearing? An experimental investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(2), 437–459 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fehr, E., Gachter, S., Kirchsteiger, G.: Reciprocity as a Contract Enforcement Device: Experimental Evidence. Econometrica 65(4), 833–860 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Dufwenberg, M., Gneezy, U.: Measuring beliefs in an experimental lost wallet game. Games and Economic Behavior 30(2), 163–182 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Brandts, J., Güth, W., Stiehler, A.: I Want YOU! An experiment studying motivational effects when assigning distributive power. Labour Economics 13(1), 1–17 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Charness, G., Haruvy, E., Sonsino, D.: Social distance and reciprocity: an internet experiment. Journal of Economics Behavior and Organization 63(1), 88–103 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Servátka, M., Vadovič, R.: Unequal outside options in the lost wallet game. Economics Bulletin 29(4), 2870–2883 (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Battigalli, P., Dufwenberg, M.: Dynamic psychological games. Journal of Economic Theory 144(1), 1–35 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Cox, J., Servátka, M., Vadovič, R.: Saliency of outside options in the lost wallet game. Experimental Economics 13(1), 66–74 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Selten, R.: Die Strategiemethode zur Erforschung des eingeschränkt rationalen Verhaltens im Rahmen eines Oligopolexperiments. In: Sauermann, H. (ed.) Beiträge zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung, pp. 136–168. Mohr, Tübingen (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brandts, J., Charness, G.: The strategy verse the direct-response method: a survey of experimental comparisons, Working papers (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Casari, M., Cason, T.: The strategy method lowers measured trustworthy behavior. Economics Letters 103(3), 157–159

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Li, J., Zhao, Y. (2011). The Puzzle of Lost Wallet Game: Challenge of Reciprocity Theory. In: Zhou, Q. (eds) Applied Economics, Business and Development. ISAEBD 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 208. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23023-3_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23023-3_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23022-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23023-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics