Advertisement

The Puzzle of Lost Wallet Game: Challenge of Reciprocity Theory

  • Jianbiao Li
  • Yuliang Zhao
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 208)

Abstract

The theory of reciprocity is one of main topics of behavioral economics and experimental economics in recent several decades. However, lost wallet game proposed by Dufwenberg and Gneezy in 2000 indicated that the reward behavior of wallet owner and the size of the outside option the wallet picker forgone are uncorrelated or weakly correlated. Servátka and Vadovič (2009) and Cox et al (2010) were trying to use the inequality of outside option and the saliency of outside option to the wallet loser to shed some light on the puzzle of lost wallet game, but their experiments hasn’t solved the asymmetry between the wallet loser’s reward behavior y and the outside option the wallet picker forgone. Therefore, the lost wallet game is still an open puzzle.

Keywords

puzzle of lost wallet game reciprocity theory inequality of outside option saliency of outside option 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rabin, M.: Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. American Economic Review 83(5), 1281–1302 (1993)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fehr, E., Schmidt, K.M.: A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(3), 817–868 (1999)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bolton, G.E., Ockenfels, A.: ERC: a theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review 90(1), 166–193 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Charness, G., Rabin, M.: Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(3), 817–869 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li, X., Li, J.: Reciprocity, trust and efficiency of governance. Nankia Economic Research 1, 101–121 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guth, W., Schmittberger, R., Schwarze, B.: An experimental analysis of ultimatium bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3(4), 367–388 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., McCabe, K.: Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior 10(1), 122–142 (1995)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abbink, K., Irlenbusch, B., Renner, E.: The moonlighting game. Journal Economics Behaviror and Organization 42(2), 265–277 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Falk, A., Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U.: Testing theories of fairness—Intentions matter. Game and Economics and Behavior 62(1), 287–304 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fehr, E., Kirchsteiger, G., Riedl, A.: Does fairness prevent market clearing? An experimental investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(2), 437–459 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fehr, E., Gachter, S., Kirchsteiger, G.: Reciprocity as a Contract Enforcement Device: Experimental Evidence. Econometrica 65(4), 833–860 (1997)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dufwenberg, M., Gneezy, U.: Measuring beliefs in an experimental lost wallet game. Games and Economic Behavior 30(2), 163–182 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brandts, J., Güth, W., Stiehler, A.: I Want YOU! An experiment studying motivational effects when assigning distributive power. Labour Economics 13(1), 1–17 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Charness, G., Haruvy, E., Sonsino, D.: Social distance and reciprocity: an internet experiment. Journal of Economics Behavior and Organization 63(1), 88–103 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Servátka, M., Vadovič, R.: Unequal outside options in the lost wallet game. Economics Bulletin 29(4), 2870–2883 (2009)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Battigalli, P., Dufwenberg, M.: Dynamic psychological games. Journal of Economic Theory 144(1), 1–35 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cox, J., Servátka, M., Vadovič, R.: Saliency of outside options in the lost wallet game. Experimental Economics 13(1), 66–74 (2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Selten, R.: Die Strategiemethode zur Erforschung des eingeschränkt rationalen Verhaltens im Rahmen eines Oligopolexperiments. In: Sauermann, H. (ed.) Beiträge zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung, pp. 136–168. Mohr, Tübingen (1967)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brandts, J., Charness, G.: The strategy verse the direct-response method: a survey of experimental comparisons, Working papers (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Casari, M., Cason, T.: The strategy method lowers measured trustworthy behavior. Economics Letters 103(3), 157–159Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jianbiao Li
    • 1
  • Yuliang Zhao
    • 1
  1. 1.Business School of Nankai UnversityTianjinP.R. China

Personalised recommendations