Advertisement

Adding Tangential Forces in Lateral Exploration of Stiffness Maps

  • Karljohan Lundin Palmerius
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6851)

Abstract

We believe that the lateral exploration of surfaces with varying stiffness, stiffness maps, using computer generated haptics is an underestimated and important procedure with impact in many application areas. Feeling the change of stiffness while sweeping the haptic probe over a surface can potentially give an understanding of the spatial distribution of this stiffness, however current algorithms lack tangential cues of stiffness changes. This introduces energy sources and sinks that potentially affects the stability of the system, apart from being physically incorrect and thus unrealistic. We discuss the forces and effects involved in the exploration of stiffness maps and propose an energy-based algorithm for tangential forces that augments the feedback from the map, in particular during lateral exploration. The algorithm is based on basic physical principles and has the potential to increase both realism and stability. A user study was conducted to analyze the effect of this algorithm on stiffness perception.

Keywords

stiffness map kinaesthetics lateral forces energy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Armstrong, J.S.: Significance tests harm progress in forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting 23, 321–327 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cheon, J., Choi, S.: Perceptualizing a “Haptic edge” with varying stiffness based on force constancy. In: Pan, Z., Cheok, D.A.D., Haller, M., Lau, R., Saito, H., Liang, R. (eds.) ICAT 2006. LNCS, vol. 4282, pp. 392–405. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cheon, J., Choi, S.: Haptizing a surface height change with varying stiffness based on force consistency: Effect of surface normal rendering. In: Proceedings of the World Haptics Conference (2007) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheon, J., Hwang, I., Han, G., Choi, S.: Haptizing surface topography with varying stiffness based on force constancy: Extended algorithm. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (2008) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Choi, S., Walker, L., Tan, H.Z., Crittenden, S., Reifenberger, R.: Force constancy and its effect on haptic perception of virtual surfaces. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 2(2), 89–105 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coles, T., John, N.W., Gould, D.A., Caldwell, D.G.: Haptic palpation for the femoral pulse in virtual interventional radiology. In: Proceedings of Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (2009) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hutchins, M.: A constraint equation algebra as a basis for haptic rendering. In: Proceedings of Phantom User Group Workshop (2000) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klymenko, V., Pizer, S.M., Johnston, R.E.: Visual psychophysics and medical imaging: Nonparametric adaptive method for rapid threshold estimation in sensitivity experiments. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 9(4), 353–365 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lawrence, D.A., Pao, L.Y., Dougherty, A.M., Salada, M.A., Pavlou, Y.: Ratehardness: A new performance metric for haptic interfaces. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 16(4), 357–371 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lederman, S.J., Klatzky, R.L.: Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition. Cognitive Psychology 19(3), 342–368 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Levitt, H.: Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49(2), 467–477 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Massie, T.H., Salisbury, J.K.: The phantom haptic interface: A device for probing virtual objects. In: Proceedings of the ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (1994) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ruspini, D.C., Kolarov, K., Khatib, O.: The haptic display of complex graphical environments. Computer Graphics 31(Annual Conference Series), 345–352 (1997)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Salisbury, K., Brock, D., Massie, T., Swarup, N., Zilles, C.: Haptic rendering: Programming touch interaction with virtual objects. In: Proceedings of the 1995 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics (1995) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yano, H., Nudejima, M., Iwata, H.: Development of haptic rendering methods of rigidity distribution for tool-handling type haptic interface. In: Proceedings of the World Haptics Conference (2005) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zilles, C.B., Salisbury, J.K.: A constraint-based god-object method for haptic display. In: Proceedings of IEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Human Robot Interaction, and Cooperative Robots, vol. 3, pp. 146–151 (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karljohan Lundin Palmerius
    • 1
  1. 1.C-ResearchLinköping UniversitySweden

Personalised recommendations