Skip to main content

Abstract

A central question in algorithmic mechanism design is to understand the additional difficulty introduced by truthfulness requirements in the design of approximation algorithms for social welfare maximization. In this paper, by studying the problem of single-parameter combinatorial auctions, we obtain the first black-box reduction that converts any approximation algorithm to a truthful mechanism with essentially the same approximation factor in a prior-free setting. In fact, our reduction works for the more general class of symmetric single-parameter problems. Here, a problem is symmetric if its allocation space is closed under permutations.

As extensions, we also take an initial step towards exploring the power of black-box reductions for general single-parameter and multi-parameter problems by showing several positive and negative results. We believe that the algorithmic and game theoretic insights gained from our approach will help better understand the tradeoff between approximability and the incentive compatibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Babaioff, M., Lavi, R., Pavlov, E.: Single-value combinatorial auctions and implementation in undominated strategies. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithm (SODA), pp. 1054–1063. ACM, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balcan, M.-F., Blum, A., Hartline, J.D., Mansour, Y.: Mechanism design via machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pp. 605–614 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bei, X., Huang, Z.: Bayesian incentive compatibility via fractional assignments. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA ( to appear, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Briest, P., Krysta, P., Vöcking, B.: Approximation techniques for utilitarian mechanism design. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 39–48. ACM, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buchfuhrer, D., Dughmi, S., Fu, H., Kleinberg, R., Mossel, E., Papadimitriou, C., Schapira, M., Singer, Y., Umans, C.: Inapproximability for vcg-based combinatorial auctions. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charikar, M., Makarychev, K., Makarychev, Y.: Near-optimal algorithms for maximum constraint satisfaction problems. ACM Trans. Algorithms 5, 1–32 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke, E.H.: Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice 11(1) (September 1971)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Diakonikolas, I., Kane, D.M., Nelson, J.: Bounded independence fools degree-2 threshold functions. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shaddin, D., Tim, R.: Black-box randomized reductions in algorithmic mechanism design. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dughmi, S., Roughgarden, T., Yan, Q.: From convex optimization to randomized mechanisms: Toward optimal combinatotial auctions for submodular bidders. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Engebretsen, L., Holmerin, J.: More efficient queries in PCPs for NP and improved approximation hardness of maximum CSP. Random Structures & Algorithms 33(4), 497–514 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Goel, G., Karande, C., Wang, L.: Single-parameter combinatorial auctions with partially public valuations. In: Kontogiannis, S., Koutsoupias, E., Spirakis, P.G. (eds.) Algorithmic Game Theory. LNCS, vol. 6386, pp. 234–245. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Groves, T.: Incentives in teams. Econometrica 41(4), 617–631 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Hartline, J., Kleinberg, R., Malekian, A.: Bayesian incentive compatibility via matchings. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA ( to appear, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hartline, J.D., Lucier, B.: Bayesian algorithmic mechanism design. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 301–310. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Håstad, J., Wigderson, A.: Simple analysis of graph tests for linearity and pcp. Random Structures and Algorithms 22(2), 139–160 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Daniel, M.: Kane and Jelani Nelson. A derandomized sparse Johnson-Lindenstrauss transform. Arxiv preprint arXiv:1006.3585 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lavi, R., Swamy, C.: Truthful and near-optimal mechanism design via linear programming. In: Proceedings of the 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pp. 595–604. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Meka, R., Zuckerman, D.: Pseudorandom generators for polynomial threshold functions. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 427–436 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Myerson, R.: Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research 6(1), 58–73 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Nisan, N., Ronen, A.: Algorithmic mechanism design. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 129–140 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Papadimitriou, C., Schapira, M., Singer, Y.: On the hardness of being truthful. In: In 49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Samorodnitsky, A., Trevisan, L.: A PCP characterization of NP with optimal amortized query complexity. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 191–199. ACM, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vickrey, W.: Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. The Journal of Finance 16(1), 8–37 (1961)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Vondrak, J.: Optimal approximation for the submodular welfare problem in the value oracle model. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 67–74. ACM, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Huang, Z., Wang, L., Zhou, Y. (2011). Black-Box Reductions in Mechanism Design. In: Goldberg, L.A., Jansen, K., Ravi, R., Rolim, J.D.P. (eds) Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques. APPROX RANDOM 2011 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6845. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22935-0_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22935-0_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22934-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22935-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics