Skip to main content

On More Realistic Environment Distributions for Defining, Evaluating and Developing Intelligence

  • Conference paper
Artificial General Intelligence (AGI 2011)

Abstract

One insightful view of the notion of intelligence is the ability to perform well in a diverse set of tasks, problems or environments. One of the key issues is therefore the choice of this set, which can be formalised as a ‘distribution’. Formalising and properly defining this distribution is an important challenge to understand what intelligence is and to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). In this paper, we agree with previous criticisms that a universal distribution using a reference universal Turing machine (UTM) over tasks, environments, etc., is perhaps a much too general distribution, since, e.g., the probability of other agents appearing on the scene or having some social interaction is almost 0 for many reference UTMs. Instead, we propose the notion of Darwin-Wallace distribution for environments, which is inspired by biological evolution, artificial life and evolutionary computation. However, although enlightening about where and how intelligence should excel, this distribution has so many options and is uncomputable in so many ways that we certainly need a more practical alternative. We propose the use of intelligence tests over multi-agent systems, in such a way that agents with a certified level of intelligence at a certain degree are used to construct the tests for the next degree. This constructive methodology can then be used as a more realistic intelligence test and also as a testbed for developing and evaluating AGI systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dowe, D.L.: Foreword re C. S. Wallace. Computer Journal 51(5), 523–560 (2008); Christopher Stewart WALLACE (1933-2004) memorial special issue

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dowe, D.L.: Minimum Message Length and statistically consistent invariant (objective?) Bayesian probabilistic inference - from (medical) “evidence”. Social Epistemology 22(4), 433–460 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dowe, D.L.: MML, hybrid Bayesian network graphical models, statistical consistency, invariance and uniqueness. In: Bandyopadhyay, P.S., Forster, M.R. (eds.) Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Statistics, vol. 7, pp. 901–982. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dowe, D.L., Hajek, A.R.: A computational extension to the Turing Test. In: 4th Conf. of the Australasian Cognitive Science Society, Newcastle, Australia (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goertzel, B.: The Embodied Communication Prior: A characterization of general intelligence in the context of Embodied social interaction. In: 8th IEEE International Conference on, Cognitive Informatics, ICCI 2009, pp. 38–43. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Goertzel, B., Bugaj, S.V.: AGI Preschool: a framework for evaluating early-stage human-like AGIs. In: Intl. Conf. on Artificial General Intelligence (AGI 2009) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hernández-Orallo, J.: Beyond the Turing Test. J. Logic, Language & Information 9(4), 447–466 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hernández-Orallo, J.: On the computational measurement of intelligence factors. In: Meystel, A. (ed.) Performance metrics for intelligent systems workshop, pp. 1–8. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hernández-Orallo, J.: A (hopefully) non-biased universal environment class for measuring intelligence of biological and artificial systems. In: Hutter, M., et al. (eds.) Artificial General Intelligence, pp. 182–183 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hernández-Orallo, J., Dowe, D.L.: Measuring universal intelligence: Towards an anytime intelligence test. Artificial Intelligence 174(18), 1508–1539 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Hernández-Orallo, J., Minaya-Collado, N.: A formal definition of intelligence based on an intensional variant of Kolmogorov complexity. In: Proc. Intl Symposium of Engineering of Intelligent Systems (EIS 1998), pp. 146–163. ICSC Press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Herrmann, E., Call, J., Hernández-Lloreda, M.V., Hare, B., Tomasello, M.: Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: The cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science 317(5843), 1360–1366 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hibbard, B.: Bias and No Free Lunch in Formal Measures of Intelligence. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence 1(1), 54–61 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Krebs, J.R., Dawkins, R.: Animal signals: mind-reading and manipulation. Behavioural Ecology: an evolutionary approach 2, 380–402 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Langton, C.G.: Artificial life: An overview. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Legg, S., Hutter, M.: A collection of definitions of intelligence. In: Proc. of the 2007 Conf. on Artificial General Intelligence, pp. 17–24. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Legg, S., Hutter, M.: Universal intelligence: A definition of machine intelligence. Minds and Machines 17(4), 391–444 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Levin, L.A.: Universal sequential search problems. Problems of Information Transmission 9(3), 265–266 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sanghi, P., Dowe, D.L.: A computer program capable of passing IQ tests. In: Proc. 4th ICCS International Conference on Cognitive Science (ICCS 2003), Sydney, Australia, pp. 570–575 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schmidhuber, J.: A computer scientist’s view of life, the universe, and everything. In: Foundations of Computer Science, p. 201. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmidhuber, J.: The Speed Prior: a new simplicity measure yielding near-optimal computable predictions. In: Kivinen, J., Sloan, R.H. (eds.) COLT 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2375, pp. 123–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Solomonoff, R.J.: A formal theory of inductive inference. Part I. Information and control 7(1), 1–22 (1964)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Stone, P., Veloso, M.: Towards collaborative and adversarial learning: A case study in robotic soccer. Intl. J. of Human-Computers Studies 48(1), 83–104 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tomasello, M., Herrmann, E.: Ape and human cognition: What’s the difference? Current Directions in Psychological Science 19(1), 3–8 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hernández-Orallo, J., Dowe, D.L., España-Cubillo, S., Hernández-Lloreda, M.V., Insa-Cabrera, J. (2011). On More Realistic Environment Distributions for Defining, Evaluating and Developing Intelligence. In: Schmidhuber, J., Thórisson, K.R., Looks, M. (eds) Artificial General Intelligence. AGI 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6830. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22887-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22887-2_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22886-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22887-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics