Evaluation of the Impetuses of Scan Path in Real Scene Searching
The modern computer vision systems usually scan the image over positions and scales to detect a predefined object, whereas the human vision system performs this task in a more intuitive and efficient manner by selecting only a few regions to fixate on. A comprehensive understanding of human search will benefit computer vision systems in search modeling. In this paper, we investigate the contributions of the sources that affect human eye scan path while observers perform a search task in real scenes. The examined sources include saliency, task guidance, and oculomotor bias. Both their influence on each consecutive pair fixations and on the entire scan path are evaluated. The experimental results suggest that the influences of task guidance and oculomotor bias are comparable, and that of saliency is rather low. They also show that we could use these sources to predict not only where humans look in the image but also the order of their visiting.
KeywordsEdit Distance Computer Vision System Combine Source Saccade Length Task Guidance
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Viola, P., Jones, M.J.: Robust real time object detection. In: Workshop on Statistical and Computational Theories of Vision (2001)Google Scholar
- 2.Dalal, N., Triggs, B.: Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: CVPR, pp. 886–893 (2005)Google Scholar
- 7.Navalpakkam, V., Itti, L.: An integrated model of top-down and bottom-up attention for optimizing detection speed. In: CVPR, pp. 2049–2056 (2006)Google Scholar
- 8.Malcolm, G., Henderson, J.: Combining top-down processes to guide eye movements during real-world scene search. Journal of Vision 10 (2010)Google Scholar
- 9.Tatler, B., Vincent, B.: The prominence of behavioural biases in eye guidance. Visual Cognition, 1–26 (2009)Google Scholar
- 10.Kollmorgen, S., Nortmann, N., Schrder, S., Knig, P.: Influence of Low-Level Stimulus Features, Task Dependent Factors, and Spatial Biases on Overt Visual Attention (2010)Google Scholar
- 12.Maioli, C., Benaglio, I., Siri, S., Sosta, K., Cappa, S.: The integration of parallel and serial processing mechanisms in visual search: Evidence from eye movement recording. European Journal of Neuroscience 13, 364–372 (2001)Google Scholar
- 13.Findlay, J., Gilchrist, I.: Eye guidance and visual search. Eye guidance in reading and scene perception, 295–312 (1998)Google Scholar
- 14.Levenstein, A.: Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. In: Soviet Physics-Doklandy, vol. 10 (1966)Google Scholar