Abstract
Photography requires not only equipment but also skill to reliably produce aesthetically-pleasing results. It can be argued that, for photography, skill is apparent even without sophisticated equipment. However, no scientific tests have been carried out to confirm that supposition. For that matter, there has been little scientific study on whether skill is apparent, whether it can be discerned by judges in blind tests. We report results of an experiment in which 33 subjects were asked to use identical cameras to photograph each of 7 pre-determined scenes, including a portrait, landscapes, and several man-made objects. Each photograph was then rated in a double-blind manner by 8 judges. Of those judges, 3 are professional photographic experts, and 5 are imaging researchers. The results show that expert judges are able to discern photographic skill to a statistically significant level, but that the enthusiasts, who are more akin to the general public, are not. We also analyse the photos using computer vision methods published in the literature, and find that there is no correlation between human judgements and the previously-published machine learning methods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Savakis, A., Etz, S., Loui, A.: Evaluation of image appeal in consumer photography. In: SPIE Human Vision and Electronic Imaging V (2000)
Tong, H., Li, M., Zhang, H.J., He, J., Zhang, C.: Classification of digital photos taken by photographers or home users. In: Proceedings of Pacific Rim Conference on Multimedia, pp. 198–205. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Ke, Y., Tang, X., Jing, F.: The design of high-level features for photo quality assessment. In: CVPR (1), pp. 419–426. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)
Datta, R., Joshi, D., Li, J., Wang, J.Z.: Studying aesthetics in photographic images using a computational approach. In: Leonardis, A., Bischof, H., Pinz, A. (eds.) ECCV 2006. LNCS, vol. 3953, pp. 288–301. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Datta, R., Wang, J.Z.: Acquine: aesthetic quality inference engine - real-time automatic rating of photo aesthetics. In: Wang, J.Z., Boujemaa, N., Ramirez, N.O., Natsev, A. (eds.) Multimedia Information Retrieval, pp. 421–424. ACM, New York (2010)
Luo, Y., Tang, X.: Photo and video quality evaluation: Focusing on the subject. In: Forsyth, D., Torr, P.H.S., Zisserman, A. (eds.) ECCV 2008, Part III. LNCS, vol. 5304, pp. 386–399. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Zakia, R.: Perception and imaging: photography–a way of seeing, 3rd edn. Elsevier Science Ltd., Cambridge (2007)
Maritz, J.S.: Distribution-free statistical methods. Chapman and Hall, London (1991)
Snavely, N., Seitz, S.M., Szeliski, R.: Photo tourism: Exploring photo collections in 3d. In: SIGGRAPH Conference Proceedings, pp. 835–846. ACM Press, New York (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sachs, T.S., Kakarala, R., Castleman, S.L., Rajan, D. (2011). A Data-Driven Approach to Understanding Skill in Photographic Composition. In: Koch, R., Huang, F. (eds) Computer Vision – ACCV 2010 Workshops. ACCV 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6469. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22819-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22819-3_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22818-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22819-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)