Skip to main content

Robustness of Serial and Parallel Biometric Fusion against Spoof Attacks

  • Conference paper
Computer Networks and Intelligent Computing (ICIP 2011)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 157))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we empirically study the robustness of multimodal biometric systems against spoof attacks. A few recent studies have questioned, contrary to a common claim in the literature, that a multimodal biometric system in parallel fusion mode can be cracked even if a single biometric trait is spoofed. Robustness of multimodal biometric systems in serial fusion mode against spoof attacks has so far not been investigated. We compare the performance of the multimodal systems with each mode under different spoof attack scenarios. We empirically show that multimodal biometric systems in both fusion modes are not intrinsically robust against spoof attacks as believed so far. In particular, multimodal biometric systems in serial fusion mode can be even less robust than systems in parallel mode, when only the best individual matcher is spoofed. Nonetheless, systems in serial fusion mode can be more robust than systems in parallel mode, when all matchers are spoofed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jain, A.K., Ross, A., Prabhakar, S.: An Introduction to Biometric Recognition. IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 14(1), 4–20 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Matsumoto, T., Matsumoto, H., Yamada, K., Hoshino, S.: Impact of Artificial Gummy Fingers on Fingerprint Systems. In: Proc. of SPIE. Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques IV, vol. 4677, pp. 275–289 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. He, X., Lu, Y., Shi, P.: A Fake Iris Detection Method Based on FFT and Quality Assessment. In: Proc. Chinese Conf. on Pattern Recognition, pp. 316–319 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kim, Y., Na, J., Yoon, S., Yi, J.: Masked Fake Face Detection using Radiance Measurements. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 26(4), 760–766 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nalini, K.R., Jonathan, H.C., Ruud, M.B.: An analysis of Minutiae Matching Strength. In: Proc. of Third AVBPA, pp. 223–228 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ross, A., Nandakumar, K., Jain, A.K.: Handbook of Multibiometrics. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rodrigues, R.N., Ling, L.L., Govindaraju, V.: Robustness of Multimodal Biometric Methods against Spoof Attacks. J. Visual Languages and Computing 20(3), 169–179 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rodrigues, R.N., Kamat, N., Govindaraju, V.: Evaluation of Biometric Spoofing in a Multimodal System. In: Proc. Fourth IEEE Int. Conf. Biometrics: Theory Applications and Systems, pp. 1–5 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Takabashi, K., Mimura, M., Isobe, Y., Seto, Y.: A Secure and User-Friendly Multimodal Biometric System. In: Proc. of SPIE on Biometric Technology for Human Identification, vol. 5404, pp. 12–19 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marcialis, G.L., Roli, F., Didaci, L.: Personal Identity Verification by Serial Fusion of Fingerprint and Face Matchers. Pattern Recognition 42(11), 2807–2817 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Allano, L., Dorizzi, B., Garcia-Salicetti, S.: Tuning Cost and Performance in Multimodal Biometric Systems: A Novel and Consistent View of Fusion Strategies based on the Sequential Probability Ratio Test (SPRT). Pattern Recognition Letters 31(9), 884–890 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Suen, C.Y., Lam, L.: Multiple Classifier Combination Methodologies for Different Output Levels. In: Kittler, J., Roli, F. (eds.) MCS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1857, pp. 52–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Duda, R., Hart, P., Stork, D.: Pattern Classification. John Wiley Inc., Chichester (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar, A., Kanhangad, V., David, Z.: A New Framework for Adaptive Multimodal Biometrics Management. IEEE Trans. on Information Forensics and Security 5(1), 92–102 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. NIST, http://www.itl.nist.gov/iad/894.03/biometricscores/index.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Akhtar, Z., Alfarid, N. (2011). Robustness of Serial and Parallel Biometric Fusion against Spoof Attacks. In: Venugopal, K.R., Patnaik, L.M. (eds) Computer Networks and Intelligent Computing. ICIP 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 157. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22786-8_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22786-8_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22785-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22786-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics