Skip to main content

Agent Metamodel for Virtual Reality Applications

  • Chapter
Emerging Intelligent Technologies in Industry

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 369))

Abstract

The various existing agent models do not cover all the possible uses we consider for virtual reality applications. In this paper, we present an agent metamodel (Behave) based on an environment metamodel (Veha). This metamodel allows defining agents and organizing teams of agents in a virtual environment. The use of this metamodel is illustrated by the Gaspar application which simulates activities on an aircraft carrier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bauer, B., Müller, J., Odell, J.: Agent UML: A formalism for specifying multiagent software systems. In: Ciancarini, P., Wooldridge, M.J. (eds.) AOSE 2000. LNCS, vol. 1957, pp. 109–120. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Beydoun, G., Low, G., Henderson-Sellers, B., Mouratidis, H., Gomez-Sanz, J., Pavon, J., Gonzales-Perez, C.: Faml: A generic metamodel for mas development. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 35(6), 841–863 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Desmeulles, G., Bonneaud, S., Redou, P., Rodin, V., Tisseau, J.: In virtuo experiments based on the multi-interaction system framework: the réiscop meta-model. In: CMES, Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences (October 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ehrler, L., Cranefield, S.: Executing agent uml diagrams. In: Autonomous Agent and Multi-Agent System 2004, New York, USA, pp. 906–913 (July 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ferber, J., Gutknecht, O.: Operational semantics of multi-agent organizations. In: Jennings, N., Lespérance, Y. (eds.) ATAL 1999. LNCS, vol. 1757, pp. 205–217. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Hahn, C., Madrigal-Mora, C., Fisher, K.: A plateform-independent metamodel for multiagent systems. In: Autonomous Agent and Multi-Agent System, vol. 18(2), pp. 239–266 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hubner, J., Boissier, O., Kitio, R., Ricci, A.: Instrumenting multi-agent organisations with organisational artifacts and agents. In: Autonomous Agent and Multi-Agent System, vol. 20(3), pp. 369–400 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huget, M.-P., Odell, J.: Representing agent interaction protocols with agent uml. In: Autonomous Agent and Multi-Agent System 2004, New York, USA, pp. 1244–1245 (July 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kallmann, M., Thalmann, D.: Modeling objects for interaction tasks. In: Proceedings of Computer Animation and Simulation 1998, pp. 73–86 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Montealegre Vázquez, L., López y López, F.: An agent-based model for hierarchical organizations. In: Noriega, P., Vázquez-Salceda, J., Boella, G., Boissier, O., Dignum, V., Fornara, N., Matson, E. (eds.) COIN 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4386, pp. 194–211. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Omicini, A., Ricci, A.: Mas organization within a coordination infrastructure: Experiments in tucson. In: Omicini, A., Petta, P., Pitt, J. (eds.) ESAW 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3071, pp. 520–520. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Dyke Parunak, H., Odell, J.: Representing social structures in UML. In: Wooldridge, M.J., Weiß, G., Ciancarini, P. (eds.) AOSE 2001. LNCS, vol. 2222, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Rimassa, G.: Runtime Support for Distributed Multi-Agent Systems. PhD thesis, University of Parma (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Patel-Schneider, P.F., Hayes, P., Horrocks, I.: Owl web ontology language semantics and abstract syntax. W3C Recommandation REC-owl-semantics-20040210, W3C (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Torres DaSilva, V., Choren, R., De Lucena, C.J. P.: A uml based approach for modeling and implementing multi-agent systems. In: Autonomous Agent and Multi-Agent System 2004, New York, USA, pp. 914–921 (July 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N., Kinny, D.: The gaia methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design. In: Autonomous Agent and Multi-Agent System, vol. 3(3), pp. 285–312 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Querrec, R., Buche, C., Lecorre, F., Harrouet, F. (2011). Agent Metamodel for Virtual Reality Applications. In: Ryżko, D., Rybiński, H., Gawrysiak, P., Kryszkiewicz, M. (eds) Emerging Intelligent Technologies in Industry. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 369. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22732-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22732-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22731-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22732-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics