Skip to main content

Reliability Assessment of Microarray Data Using Fuzzy Classification Methods: A Comparative Study

  • Conference paper
Advances in Computing and Communications (ACC 2011)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 190))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Microarrays have become the tool of choice for the global analysis of gene expression. Powerful data acquisition systems are now available to produce massive amounts of genetic data. However, the resultant data consists of thousands of points that are error-prone, which in turn results in erroneous biological conclusions. In this paper, a comparative study of the performance of fuzzy clustering algorithms i.e. Fuzzy C-Means, Fuzzy C-medoid, Gustafson and Kessel, Gath Geva classification, Fuzzy Possibilistic C-Means and Kernel based Fuzzy C-Means is carried out to separate microarray data into reliable and unreliable signal intensity populations. The performance criteria used in the evaluation of the classification algorithm deal with reliability, complexity and agreement rate with that of Normal Mixture Modeling. It is shown that Kernel Fuzzy C-Means classification algorithms appear to be highly sensitive to the selection of the values of the kernel parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Schena, M.: Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science 270, 467–470 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Asyali, M.H., Shoukri, M.M., Demirkaya, O., Khabar, K.S.A.: Estimation of Signal Thresholds for Microarray Data Using Mixture Modeling. Nucleic Acids Research 32(7), 1–13 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. McLachlan, G.J., Basford, K.E.: Mixture Models, Inference and Applications to Clustering. Marcel Dekker, New York (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Alci, M., Asyali, M.H.: Assessment of Reliability of Microarray Data Using Fuzzy C-Means Classification. In: Pal, N.R., Kasabov, N., Mudi, R.K., Pal, S., Parui, S.K. (eds.) ICONIP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3316, pp. 1322–1327. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Dunn, J.C.: A Fuzzy Relative of the ISODATA Process and Its Use in Detecting Compact Well-Separated Clusters. Journal of Cybernetics, 32–57 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bezdek, J.C.: Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithm. Plenum Press, New York (1981)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, S.C., Zhang, D.Q.: Robust image segmentation using FCM with spatial constrains based on new kernel-induced distance measure. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. Pt. B 34, 1907–1916 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Krishnapuram, R., Joshi, A., Yi, L.: A fuzzy relative of the k-medoids algorithm with application to web document and snippet clustering. In: IEEE International Fuzzy Systems Conference, Seoul, Korea, pp. 1281–1286 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gustafson, E., Kessel, W.: Fuzzy clustering with a fuzzy covariance matrix. In: Proc. of IEEE CDC (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gath, I., Geva, A.B.: Unsupervised optimal fuzzy clustering. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 773–781 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krishnapuram, R., Keller, J.M.: Fuzzy and Possibilistic Clustering Methods for Computer Vision. In: Mitra, S., Gupta, M., Kraske, W. (eds.) Neural and Fuzzy Systems, S. SPIE Institute Series, vol. IS 12, pp. 133–159 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krishnapuram, R., Keller, J.M.: A possibilistic approach to clustering. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 1(2), 98–110 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Murayama, T., Ohara, Y., Obuchi, M., Khabar, K.S., Higashi, H., Mukaida, N., Matsushima, K.: Human cytomegalovirus induces interleukin-8 production by a human monocytic cell line, THP-1, through acting concurrently on AP-1- and NF-kappa B-binding sites of the interleukin-8 gene. J. Virol. 71, 5692–5695 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mandava, A.K., Shahram, L., Regentova, E.E. (2011). Reliability Assessment of Microarray Data Using Fuzzy Classification Methods: A Comparative Study. In: Abraham, A., Lloret Mauri, J., Buford, J.F., Suzuki, J., Thampi, S.M. (eds) Advances in Computing and Communications. ACC 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 190. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22709-7_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22709-7_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22708-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22709-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics