Advertisement

Mining Subsidence Prediction Based on 3D Stratigraphic Model and Visualization

  • Ruisheng Jia
  • Yanjun Peng
  • Hongmei Sun
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6758)

Abstract

3D phenomenon involved in mining subsidence was Classified, summarized and aggregated, established the hierarchical structure that describing the geologic phenomena and engineering phenomena of stratum structure. Proposed a 3D stratigraphic model that mixed Multi-DEM with Tetrahedral Network. The model uses Multi-DEM to build layered surface of the earth’s surface and geology, and uses TEN to makeup inter layer geological mass. This is in favor of exactly expressing the surface information, and it is benefit to engineers and technicians to check the geological condition in the stratum, also it provides detailed geological mining conditions for the mining subsidence prediction research and accurately establishes prediction model. Engineering sample shows that the predicted results of the system is more close to the measured values.

Keywords

mining subsidence prediction 3D stratigraphic model DEMs-TEN model 3D visualization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Houlding, S.W.: 3D Geoscience Modeling,Computer Techniques for Geological Characterization. Springer, Berlin (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burford, D.J., Ger, L., Blake, E.H., et al.: A seismic modelling environ-ment as a research and teaching tool for 3-D subsurface modelling. Int. J. of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 2(2), 69–77 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Galera, C., Bennis, C., Moretti, I., et al.: Construction of coherent 3D geological blocks. Computers and Geo-Sciences 29(8), 971–984 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hengxing Lan, C., Martin, D., Lim, C.H.: RockFall analyst: A GIS extension for 3D and spatially distributed rockfall hazard modeling. Computers and Geosciences 33(2), 262–279 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smirnoff, A., Boisvert, E., Paradis, S.J.: Support vector machine for 3D modeling from sparse geological information of various origins. Computers and Geosciences 34(2), 127–143 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crooks, A., Castle, C., Batty, M.: Key challenges in agent-based modeling for geospatial simulation. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 32(6), 417–430 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Napieralski, J., Harbor, J., Li, Y.: Glacial geomorphology and geographic information systems. Earth-Science Reviews 85(1-2), 1–22 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wu, Q., Xu, H.: An approach to computer modeling and visualization of geological faults in 3D. Computers & Geosciences 29(4), 507–513 (2003)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, H., Wen, Y., Liu, A., et al.: Basic of GIS algorithm. science press, Beijing (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruisheng Jia
    • 1
  • Yanjun Peng
    • 1
  • Hongmei Sun
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Information Science and EngineeringShandong University of Science and TechnologyQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations