Skip to main content

Extending a Multi-agent Reasoning Interoperability Framework with Services for the Semantic Web Logic and Proof Layers

  • Conference paper
Rule-Based Reasoning, Programming, and Applications (RuleML 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6826))

Abstract

The ultimate vision of the Semantic Web (SW) is to offer an interoperable and information-rich web environment that will allow users to safely delegate complex actions to intelligent agents. Much work has been done for agents’ interoperability; a plethora of proposals and standards for ontology-based metadata and rule-based reasoning are already widely used. Nevertheless, the SW proof layer has been neglected so far, although it is vital for SW agents and human users to understand how a result came about, in order to increase the trust in the interchanged information. This paper focuses on the implementation of third party SW reasoning and proofing services wrapped as agents in a multi-agent framework. This way, agents can exchange and justify their arguments without the need to conform to a common rule paradigm. Via external reasoning and proofing services, the receiving agent can grasp the semantics of the received rule set and check the validity of the inferred results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hendler, J.: Agents and the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(2), 30–37 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kravari, K., Kontopoulos, E., Bassiliades, N.: EMERALD: A Multi-Agent System for Knowledge-based Reasoning Interoperability in the Semantic Web. In: Konstantopoulos, S., Perantonis, S., Karkaletsis, V., Spyropoulos, C.D., Vouros, G. (eds.) SETN 2010. LNCS, vol. 6040, pp. 173–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. JESS, the Rule Engine for the Java Platform, http://www.jessrules.com/

  4. Kravari, K., Kontopoulos, E., Bassiliades, N.: Trusted Reasoning Services for Semantic Web Agents. Informatica: Int. J. of Computing and Informatics 34(4), 429–440 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bassiliades, N., Antoniou, G., Vlahavas, I.: A Defeasible Logic Reasoner for the Semantic Web. IJSWIS 2(1), 1–41 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boley, H., Tabet, S.: RuleML: The RuleML Standardization Initiative (2000), http://www.ruleml.org/

  7. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American Magazine 284(5), 34–43 (2001) (revised 2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. FIPA Specifications, http://www.fipa.org/specifications/

  9. Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification, http://www.w3.org/TR/PR-rdf-syntax/

  10. Mule ESB, http://www.mulesoft.org

  11. Ball, M., Boley, H., Hirtle, D., Mei, J., Spencer, B.: The OO jDREW reference implementation of ruleML. In: Adi, A., Stoutenburg, S., Tabet, S. (eds.) RuleML 2005. LNCS, vol. 3791, pp. 218–223. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, M., Purvis, M., Nowostawski, M.: An Internal Agent Architecture Incorporating Standard Reasoning Components and Standards-based Agent Communication. In: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT 2005), pp. 58–64. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Purvis, M., Cranefield, S., Nowostawski, M., Carter, D.: Opal: A Multi-Level Infrastructure for Agent-Oriented Software Development. In: Information Science Discussion Paper Series, number 2002/01. University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand (2002) ISSN 1172-602

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dastani, M., van Riemsdijk, M.B., Meyer, J.-J.C.: Programming multi-agent systems in 3APL. In: Bordini, R.H., Dastani, M., Dix, J., El Fallah Seghrouchni, A. (eds.) Multi-Agent Programming: Languages, Platforms and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nowostawski, M.: Kea Enterprise Agents Documentation (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Boley, H., Kifer, M.: A Guide to the Basic Logic Dialect for Rule Interchange on the Web. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 1593–1608 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nute, D.: Defeasible Reasoning. In: 20th Int. C. on Systems Science, pp. 470–477. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maher, M.J.: Propositional defeasible logic has linear complexity. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 1(6), 691–711 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Bassiliades, N., Vlahavas, I.: R-DEVICE: An Object-Oriented Knowledge Base System for RDF Metadata. Int. Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 2(2), 24–90 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kozlenkov, A., Penaloza, R., Nigam, V., Royer, L., Dawelbait, G., Schröder, M.: Prova: Rule-based Java Scripting for Distributed Web Applications: A Case Study in Bioinformatics. In: Grust, T., Höpfner, H., Illarramendi, A., Jablonski, S., Fischer, F., Müller, S., Patranjan, P.-L., Sattler, K.-U., Spiliopoulou, M., Wijsen, J. (eds.) EDBT 2006. LNCS, vol. 4254, pp. 899–908. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Lam, H., Governatori, G.: The Making of SPINdle. In: Governatori, G., Hall, J., Paschke, A. (eds.) RuleML 2009. LNCS, vol. 5858, pp. 315–322. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Antoniou, G., Bikakis, A.: DR-Prolog: A System for Defeasible Reasoning with Rules and Ontologies on the SW. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 19, 2 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Semantic Web Knowledge Middleware, http://139.91.183.30:9090/SWKM/

  24. Paschke, A., Boley, H., Kozlenkov, A., Craig, B.: Rule responder: RuleML-based Agents for Distributed Collaboration on the Pragmatic Web. In: 2nd International Conference on Pragmatic Web, vol. 280, pp. 17–28. ACM, New York (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Antoniou, G., Bikakis, A., Dimaresis, N., Governatori, G.: Proof Explanation for a Non-monotonic Semantic Web Rules Language. Data and Knowledge Engineering 64(3), 662–687 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. CS-566 Project 2010, http://www.csd.uoc.gr/~hy566/project2010.html

  27. Antoniou, G., Billington, D., Governatori, G., Maher, M.J.: Representation results for defeasible logic. ACM Trans. Comput. Logic 2(2), 255–287 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kravari, K., Papatheodorou, K., Antoniou, G., Bassiliades, N. (2011). Extending a Multi-agent Reasoning Interoperability Framework with Services for the Semantic Web Logic and Proof Layers. In: Bassiliades, N., Governatori, G., Paschke, A. (eds) Rule-Based Reasoning, Programming, and Applications. RuleML 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6826. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22546-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22546-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22545-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22546-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics