Skip to main content

Modularity in the Rule Interchange Format

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6826))

Abstract

The adoption of standards by the knowledge representation and logic programming communities is essential for their visibility and impact. The Rule Interchange Format is a fundamental effort in this direction that should be supported by users, developers and theoreticians. For this reason, it is essential to the community to discuss the recommendations published by the W3C RIF Working Group. In particular, this paper presents the semantics of Rule Interchange Format (RIF) of multi-documents, analyses it and some deficiencies are elicited. A more general approach is proposed as an alternative semantics for multi-documents. As a side important result, some relevant problems in the semantics of RIF-FLD are also discussed and possible ways out are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alcântara, J., Damásio, C.V., Pereira, L.M.: An encompassing framework for paraconsistent logic programs. J. Applied Logic 3(1), 67–95 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Alferes, J.J., Damásio, C.V., Pereira, L.M.: A Logic Programming System for Non-monotonic Reasoning. Journal of Automated Reasoning 14(1), 93–147 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Alferes, J.J., Pereira, L.M.: On Logic Program Semantics with Two Kinds of Negation. In: Proc. of JICSLP 1992, pp. 574–588 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Analyti, A., Antoniou, G., Damásio, C.V.: A Principled Framework for Modular Web Rule Bases and Its Semantics. In: KR 2008, pp. 390–400. AAAI press, Menlo Park (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Analyti, A., Antoniou, G., Damásio, C.V.: MWeb: A principled framework for modular web rule bases and its semantics. ACM TOCL 12(2):#17, 41 (2011)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bao, J., Voutsadakis, G., Slutzki, G., Honavar, V.: Package-based description logics. In: Stuckenschmidt, H., Parent, C., Spaccapietra, S. (eds.) Modular Ontologies. LNCS, vol. 5445, pp. 349–371. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Boley, H., Kifer, M.: A guide to the basic logic dialect for rule interchange on the web. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 22(11), 1593–1608 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bugliesi, M., Lamma, E., Mello, P.: Modularity in Logic Programming. Journal of Logic Programming 19(20), 443–502 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Cabalar, P., Odintsov, S.P., Pearce, D., Valverde, A.: Partial equilibrium logic. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 50(3-4), 305–331 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Cabalar, P., Pearce, D., Rondogiannis, P., Wadge, W.W.: A purely model-theoretic semantics for disjunctive logic programs with negation. In: Baral, C., Brewka, G., Schlipf, J. (eds.) LPNMR 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4483, pp. 44–57. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Damásio, C.V., Pereira, L.M.: A model theory for paraconsistent logic programming. In: Pinto-Ferreira, C., Mamede, N.J. (eds.) EPIA 1995. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 990, pp. 377–386. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Damásio, C.V., Pereira, L.M.: A Survey of Paraconsistent Semantics for Logic Programs. In: Gabbay, D., Smets, P. (eds.) Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, vol. 2, pp. 241–320. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dao-Tran, M., Eiter, T., Fink, M., Krennwallner, T.: Modular nonmonotonic logic programming revisited. In: Hill, P.M., Warren, D.S. (eds.) ICLP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5649, pp. 145–159. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Doran, P., Tamma, V., Iannone, L.: Ontology module extraction for ontology reuse: an ontology engineering perspective. In: Proc. of ACM-CIKM 2007, pp. 61–70. ACM, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Logic programs with Classical Negation. In: 7th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 1990), pp. 579–597 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grau, B.C., Horrocks, I., Kazakov, Y., Sattler, U.: A logical framework for modularity of ontologies. In: Proc. IJCAI 2007, pp. 298–304. AAAI, Menlo Park (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kifer, M.: Flora-2: An object-oriented knowledge base language (2007), http://flora.sourceforge.net/

  18. Konev, B., Lutz, C., Walther, D., Wolter, F.: Semantic modularity and module extraction in description logics. In: Proc. of ECAI 2008, pp. 55–59. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Oikarinen, E., Janhunen, T.: Modular Equivalence for Normal Logic Programs. In: Proc. of ECAI 2006, pp. 412–416 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. W3C OWL Working Group (ed.) OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Document Overview. W3C Recommendation (October 27, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Patel-Schneider, P.F., Hayes, P., Horrocks, I.: OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax. W3C Recommendation (February 10, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pearce, D.: Equilibrium logic. Annals of Math. and Artificial Intelligence 47(1-2), 3–41 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Boley, H., Kifer, M. (eds.) RIF Basic Logic Dialect. W3C Recommendation (June 22, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Heymans, S., Kifer, M. (eds.) RIF Core Answer Set Programming Dialect, 2009. RuleML specification (December 17, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kifer, M. (ed.) RIF Core Logic Programming Dialect Based on the Well-founded Semantics, 2009. RuleML specification (August 13, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Boley, H., Hallmark, G., Kifer, M., Paschke, A., Polleres, A., Reynolds, D. (eds.) RIF Core Logic Dialect, W3C Recommendation (2010) (June 22, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Boley, H., Kifer, M. (eds.) RIF Framework for Logic Dialects, W3C Recommendation (2010) (June 22, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. de Sainte Marie, C., Hallmark, G., Paschke, A. (eds.): RIF Production Rule Dialect. W3C Recommendation (June 22, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Damásio, C.V., Analyti, A., Antoniou, G. (2011). Modularity in the Rule Interchange Format. In: Bassiliades, N., Governatori, G., Paschke, A. (eds) Rule-Based Reasoning, Programming, and Applications. RuleML 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6826. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22546-8_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22546-8_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22545-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22546-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics