Abstract
A key issue in teaching and learning in information retrieval – particularly for library and information science students – is the gap in prior knowledge compared with the need for mathematics to conduct and evaluate searches. In this chapter, we examine the use of online Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) to support these types of students, and narrow this gap between experience and knowledge. We provide some background in terms of related work and the use of MCQs for assessment. The key areas of search which can be supported by this form of assessment are defined, and a proposed strategy for designing question sets in order to support learning is provided. The key contribution of this chapter is the strategy for designing MCQs by taking educational theory and marrying it with key concepts in learning for search.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Appleby J, Cox W (2002) The transition to higher education. In: Kahn P, Kyle J (eds) Effective learning and teaching in mathematics and its applications. Kogan Page, London, pp 3–19
Cleverdon CW (1967) The Cranfield test on index language devices, ASLIB Proceedings, 19. In: Spark Jones K, Willet P (eds) Readings in information retrieval. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, pp 47–59
Croft T (2002) Mathematics: the teaching, learning and support of non-specialists. In: Kahn P, Kyle J (eds) Effective learning and teaching in mathematics and its applications. Kogan Page, London, pp 144–157
Dialog (2010) Dialog pocket guide. http://support.dialog.com/searchaids/dialog/pocketguide/. Accessed 19 Oct 2010
Factiva (2001) Inside out – the complete reference for Factiva.com. http://factiva.com/learning/F-646InsideOutguide.pdf. Accessed 19 Oct 2010
Fernández-Luna JM, Huete JF, MacFarlane A, Efthimiadis EN (2009) Teaching and learning information retrieval. Inf Retr 12:201–226
Higgins E, Tatham L (2003) Exploring the potential of multiple-choice questions in assessment, learning and teaching in action 2:1, winter. http://www.celt.mmu.ac.uk/ltia/issue4/higginstatham.shtml. Accessed 19 Oct 2010
Higgins E, Tatham L (2008) Assessing by multiple choice question (MCQ) test. The Higher Education Academy. http://www.ukcle.ac.uk/resources/assessment-and-feedback/mcqs/. Accessed 19 Oct 2010
Kekäläinen J, Järvelin K (2002) Using graded relevance assessments in IR evaluation. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 53(13):1120–1129
MacFarlane A (2007) Pedagogic challenges in information retrieval – teaching mathematics to postgraduate information science students. In: Huete J, Fernández-Luna JM, MacFarlane A, Ounis I (eds) First International Workshop on Teaching and Learning of Information Retrieval (TLIR 2007). http://www.bcs.org/server.php?show=nav.8704. Accessed 19 Oct 2010
MacFarlane A (2009) Teaching mathematics for search using a tutorial style of delivery. Inf Retr 12:162–178
McKenna C, Bull J (1999) Designing effective objective test questions: an introductory workshop. CAA Centre, Loughborough University, 17 June. http://www.caacentre.ac.uk/dldocs/otghdout.pdf. Accessed 19 Oct 2010
Sacchanand, C, Jaroenpuntaruk, V. (2006) "Development of a web-based self-training package for information retrieval using the distance education approach", Electronic Library, The, Vol. 24 Iss: 4, pp 501–516
Smith G, Wood L, Crawford K, Coupland M, Ball G, Stephenson B (1996) Constructing mathematical examinations to assess a range of knowledge and skills. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol 30:47–63
TREC (n.d.) Text Retrieval Conference. http://trec.nist.gov/. Accessed 19 Oct 2010
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
MacFarlane, A. (2011). Using Multiple Choice Questions to Assist Learning for Information Retrieval. In: Efthimiadis, E., Fernández-Luna, J., Huete, J., MacFarlane, A. (eds) Teaching and Learning in Information Retrieval. The Information Retrieval Series, vol 31. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22511-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22511-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22510-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22511-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)