Advertisement

Some Generalised Comparative Determiners

  • Richard Zuber
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6736)

Abstract

Functions denoted by specific comparative expressions called generalised comparative determiners are analysed. These expressions form verb arguments when applied to common nouns. They denote functions which take sets and a binary relation as argument and give a set as result. These functions are thus different from denotations of ”ordinary” determiners. However, they do obey some similar constraints, properly generalised. It is shown that verbal arguments obtained from such generalised determiners extend the expressive power of NLs since functions that they denote are not just case extensions of type 〈1〉 quantifiers used to interpret ”ordinary” determiner phrases.

Keywords

Binary Relation Noun Phrase Common Noun Generalise Determiner Verbal Argument 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beghelli, F.: Structured Quantifiers. In: Kanazawa, M., Piñon, C. (eds.) Dynamics, Polarity, and Quantification, pp. 119–145. CSLI Publications (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Keenan, E.L.: Semantic Case Theory. In: Groenendijk, J., Stokhof, M. (eds.) Sixth Amsterdam Colloquium (1987)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Keenan, E.L.: On Semantics and the Binding Theory. In: Hawkins, J. (ed.) Explaining Language Universals, pp. 105–144. Blackwell, Malden (1988)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Keenan, E.L.: On the denotations of anaphors. Research on Language and Computation 5(1), 5–17 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keenan, E.L., Moss, L.: Generalized quantifiers and the expressive power of natural language. In: van Benthem, J., ter Meulen, A. (eds.) Generalized Quantifiers, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 73–124 (1985)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keenan, E.L., Westerståhl, D.: Generalized Quantifiers in Linguistics and Logic. In: van Benthem, J., ter Meulen, A. (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language, pp. 837–893. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Szabolcsi, A.: Comparative supelatives. In: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, pp. 245–266 (1986)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zuber, R.: More Algebras for Determiners. In: Blache, P., Stabler, E. (eds.) LACL 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3492, pp. 347–362. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zuber, R.: A semantic constraint on binary determiners. Linguistics and Philosophy 32, 95–114 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zuber, R.: Generalising Conservativity. In: Dawar, A., de Queiroz, R. (eds.) WoLLIC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6188, pp. 247–258. Springer, Heidelberg (2010a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zuber, R.: Semantics of Slavic anaphoric possessive determiners. In: Proceedings of SALT 19 (2010b) forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zuber, R.: Semantic constraints on anaphoric determiners. Research on Language and Computation (2010c) forthcomingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Zuber
    • 1
  1. 1.Rayé des cadres du CNRSParisFrance

Personalised recommendations