Abstract
In this paper, the notion of “the content of a dialogue” is shown to be problematic in light of the phenomena of semantic coordination in dialogue, and the associated notion of semantic plasticity – the ability of meanings to change as a result of language use. Specifically, it appears that any notion of content in dialogue based on classical model-theoretical semantics will be insufficient for capturing semantic plasticity. An alternative formal semantics, type theory with records (TTR) is briefly introduced and is show to be better equipped to deal with semantic coordination and plasticity. However, it is also argued that any account of content in dialogue which takes semantic coordination seriously will also need to consider the problems it raises for some concepts central to traditional notions of meaning, namely inference and truth.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Asher, N.: Lexical Meaning in Context. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010), http://www.cambridge.org/
Asher, N., Lascarides, A.: Logics of Conversation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003), http://www.cambridge.org/
Brennan, S.E., Clark, H.H.: Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 22, 482–493 (1996)
Briscoe, E.J. (ed.): Linguistic Evolution through Language Acquisition: Formal and Computational Models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002), http://www.isrl.uiuc.edu/~amag/langev/paper/briscoe2002editedbook.html
Chierchia, G., Turner, R.: Semantics and property theory. Linguistics and Philosophy 11(3) (1988)
Clark, E.V.: Young children’s uptake of new words in conversation. Language in Society 36, 157–182 (2007)
Clark, E.: The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)
Clark, E.V., Wong, A.D.W.: Pragmatic directions about language use: Offers of words and relations. Language in Society 31, 181–212 (2002)
Clark, H.H., Wilkes-Gibbs, D.: Refering as a collaborative process. Cognition 22, 1–39 (1986)
Cooper, R.: Austinian truth, attitudes and type theory. Research on Language and Computation 3, 333–362 (2005)
Cooper, R.: Type theory with records and unification-based grammar. In: Hamm, F., Kepser, S. (eds.) Logics for Linguistic Structures. Mouton de Gruyter (2008), http://www.ling.gu.se/~cooper/records/ttrhpsg.pdf
Cooper, R., Larsson, S.: Compositional and ontological semantics in learning from corrective feedback and explicit definition. In: Edlund, J., Gustafson, J., Hjalmarsson, A., Skantze, G. (eds.) Proceedings of DiaHolmia, 2009 Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (2009)
Coquand, T., Pollack, R., Takeyama, M.: A logical framework with dependently typed records. Fundamenta Informaticae XX, 1–22 (2004)
van Diggelen, J., Beun, R.J., Dignum, F., van Eijk, R.M., Meyer, J.J.: Ontology negotiation in heterogeneous multi-agent systems: The anemone system. Applied Ontology 2, 267–303 (2007)
Garrod, S.C., Anderson, A.: Saying what you mean in dialogue: a study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition 27, 181–218 (1987)
Healey, P.: Expertise or expertese?: The emergence of task-oriented sub-languages. In: Shafto, M., Langley, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 301–306 (1997)
Larsson, S.: Coordinating on ad-hoc semantic systems in dialogue. In: Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (2007)
Larsson, S.: Formalizing the dynamics of semantic systems in dialogue. In: Cooper, R., Kempson, R. (eds.) Language in Flux - Dialogue Coordination, Language Variation, Change and Evolution. College Publications, London (2008)
Larsson, S., Cooper, R.: Towards a formal view of corrective feedback. In: Alishahi, A., Poibeau, T., Villavicencio, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Acquisition, EACL, pp. 1–9 (2009)
Lascarides, A.: Agreement, disputes and commitments in dialogue. Journal of Semantics 26, 109–158(50) (13 May 2009)
Pickering, M.J., Garrod, S.: Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(02), 169–226 (2004)
Steels, L., Belpaeme, T.: Coordinating perceptually grounded categories through language: A case study for colour. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28(4), 469–489 (2005), http://www.isrl.uiuc.edu/~amag/langev/paper/steels_BBS_color.html , target Paper, discussion 489-529
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Larsson, S. (2011). Do Dialogues Have Content?. In: Pogodalla, S., Prost, JP. (eds) Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics. LACL 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6736. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22221-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22221-4_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22220-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22221-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)