Advertisement

The Relationship between Dominant AHP/CCM and ANP

  • Eizo Kinoshita
  • Shin Sugiura
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 10)

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that the equation, Dominant AHP (analytic hierarchy process)+ANP(analytic network process)=Dominant AHP, is valid, when the weights of criteria relative to the evaluation of dominant alternative is chosen as the basis for the evaluation of Dominant AHP. It also substantiates that the equation, CCM(concurrent convergence method)+ANP=CCM, is valid by applying the same approach.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Network Process. Expert Choice (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kinoshita, E., Nakanishi, M.: A Proposal of a New Viewpoint in Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Infrastructure Planning and Management, IV-36 569, 1–8 (1997) (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kinoshita, E., Nakanishi, M.: Proposal of New AHP model in light of Dominant relationship among Alternatives. Journal of Operations Research Society of Japan 42(2), 180–197 (1999)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kinoshita, E., Nakanishi, M.: A Proposal of CCM as a Processing Technique for Additional Data in the Dominant AHP. Journal of Infrastructure Planning and Management, IV-42 611, 13–19 (1999) (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kinoshita, E., Sekitani, K., Shi, J.: Mathematical Properties of Dominant AHP and Concurrent Convergence Method. Journal of Operations Research Society of Japan 45(2), 198–213 (2002)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eizo Kinoshita
    • 1
  • Shin Sugiura
    • 1
  1. 1.Meijo UniversityKaniJapan

Personalised recommendations