Advertisement

Interpretation of Loss Aversion in Kano’s Quality Model

  • Péter Földesi
  • János Botzheim
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 10)

Abstract

For designing and developing products/services it is vital to know the relevancy of the performance generated by each technical attribute and how they can increase customer satisfaction. Improving the parameters of technical attributes requires financial resources, and the budgets are generally limited. Thus the optimum target can be the achievement of the minimum overall cost for a given satisfaction level. Kano’s quality model classifies the relationships between customer satisfaction and attribute-level performance and indicates that some of the attributes have a non-linear relationship to satisfaction, rather power-function should be used. For the customers’ subjective evaluation these relationships are not deterministic and are uncertain. Also the cost function are uncertain, where the loss aversion of decision makers should be considered as well. This paper proposes a method for fuzzy extension of Kano’s model and presents numerical examples.

Keywords

Fuzzy Number Customer Satisfaction Memetic Algorithm Loss Aversion Triangular Fuzzy Number 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Balázs, K., Botzheim, J., Kóczy, L.T.: Comparative investigation of various evolutionary and memetic algorithms. In: Rudas, I.J., Fodor, J., Kacprzyk, J. (eds.) Computational Intelligence in Engineering. SCI, vol. 313, pp. 129–140. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bode, J., Fung, R.Y.K.: Cost engineering with quality function deployment. Computers and Industrial Engineering 35, 587–590 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Botzheim, J., Földesi, P.: Parametric representation of fuzzy power function for decision-making processes. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Management Engineering, ISME 2010, Kitakyushu, Japan, pp. 248–255 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Botzheim, J., Drobics, M., Kóczy, L.T.: Feature selection using bacterial optimization. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-based Systems, IPMU 2004, Perugia, Italy, pp. 797–804 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Botzheim, J., Cabrita, C., Kóczy, L.T., Ruano, A.E.: Fuzzy rule extraction by bacterial memetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 11th World Congress of International Fuzzy Systems Association, IFSA 2005, Beijing, China, pp. 1563–1568 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, L., Weng, M.C.: An evaluation approach to engineering design in QFD processes using fuzzy goal programming models. European Journal of Operational Research 172, 230–248 (2006)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Conklin, M., Powaga, K., Lipovetsky, S.: Customer satisfaction analysis: Identification of key drivers. European Journal of Operational Research 154, 819–827 (2004)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Földesi, P., Botzheim, J.: Modeling of loss aversion in solving fuzzy road transport traveling salesman problem using eugenic bacterial memetic algorithm. Memetic Computing 2(4), 259–271 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hauser, J.R., Clausing, D.: The house of quality. Harvard Business Review, 63–73 (1988)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., Tsuji, S.: Attractive quality and must-be quality. The Journal of Japanese Society for Quality Control 14(2), 39–48 (1984)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Levenberg, K.: A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Quart. Appl. Math. 2(2), 164–168 (1944)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Luh, G.C., Lee, S.W.: A bacterial evolutionary algorithm for the job shop scheduling problem. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers 23(3), 185–191 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marquardt, D.: An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J. Soc. Indust. Appl. Math. 11(2), 431–441 (1963)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Matzler, K., Hinterhuber, H.H.: How to make product development projects more successful by integrating kano’s model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment. Technovation 18, 25–38 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Matzler, K., Bailom, F., Hinterhuber, H.H., Renzl, B., Pichler, J.: The asymmetric relationship between attribute-level performance and overall customer satisfaction: a reconsideration of the importance-performance analysis. Industrial Marketing Management 33, 271–277 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moscato, P.: On evolution, search, optimization, genetic algorithms and martial arts: Towards memetic algorithms. Tech. Rep. Caltech Concurrent Computation Program, Report. 826, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA (1989)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moskowitz, H., Kim, K.J.: QFD optimizer: A novice friendly quality function deployment decision support system for optimizing product designs. Computers and Industrial Engineering 32, 641–655 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nawa, N.E., Furuhashi, T.: Fuzzy system parameters discovery by bacterial evolutionary algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 7(5), 608–616 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tang, J., Fung, R.Y.K., Xu, B., Wang, D.: A new approach to quality function deployment planning with financial consideration. Computers & Operations research 29, 1447–1463 (2002)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhou, M.: Fuzzy logic and optimization models for implementing QFD. Computers and Industrial Engineering 35, 237–240 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Péter Földesi
    • 1
  • János Botzheim
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Logistics and ForwardingSzéchenyi István UniversityGyőrHungary
  2. 2.Department of AutomationSzéchenyi István UniversityGyőrHungary

Personalised recommendations