Skip to main content

Non-symmetric Indiscernibility

  • Conference paper
Book cover Knowledge Processing and Data Analysis (KPP 2007, KONT 2007)

Abstract

Rough Sets were introduced to express approximations based on an indiscernibility equivalence relation (Pawlak [4,5]). They have a natural lattice structure, which can nicely be described and widely generalised in the language of Formal Concept Analysis [2]. One instance of such a generalisation seems to be particularly promising: That of an indiscernibility preorder. The mathematical theory is almost the same as in the case of an equivalence relation, and some of the applications can be carried over. However, using preorders as indiscenibility relations needs getting used to, since such relations are not necessarily symmetric. We give an introduction and clarify the role of isolated and singleton elements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baixeries, J.: A Formal Concept Analysis Framework To Model Functional Dependencies. In: Proceedings of Mathematical Methods for Learning (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ganter, B.: Lattices of Rough Set Abstractions as P-Products. In: Medina, R., Obiedkov, S. (eds.) ICFCA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4933, pp. 199–216. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Ganter, B., Kuznetsov, S.: Scale Coarsening as Feature Selection. In: Medina, R., Obiedkov, S. (eds.) ICFCA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4933, pp. 217–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 11, 341–356 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Data. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Dordrecht (1991)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Wolff, K.E.: Concepts in Fuzzy Scaling Theory: Order and Granularity. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 132(1) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zadeh, L.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning. Parts I–III, Information Sciences 8 (1975), 9 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  8. See for an extensive bibliography, http://roughsets.home.pl/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ganter, B. (2011). Non-symmetric Indiscernibility. In: Wolff, K.E., Palchunov, D.E., Zagoruiko, N.G., Andelfinger, U. (eds) Knowledge Processing and Data Analysis. KPP KONT 2007 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6581. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22140-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22140-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22139-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22140-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics