Advertisement

Ebook Readers: An iPod for Your Books in the Cloud

  • Ann-Marie Horcher
  • Maxine Cohen
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 174)

Abstract

The new way to carry books or literature is to not carry it at all. Not only have computing resources and data moved to the cloud, so has the latest novel or self-help book. The key to the acceptance of this technology is usable design that anticipates a reader’s needs while still invoking a comfortable form factor – the book [1]. Though e-book readers have been available for a decade, the latest wave of e-book readers has achieved a new level of technology acceptance. This trend and potential acceptance of future models can be understood by applying task-technology fit theory [2] to a usability study of the Barnes and Noble Nook and Amazon Kindle ebook readers.

Keywords

ebook digital libraries usability task-technology fit gender bias 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Tsakonas, G., Papatheodorou, C.: Exploring usefulness and usability in the evaluation of open access digital libraries. Information Processing & Management 44(3), 1234–1250 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goodhue, D.L., Thompson, R.L.: Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance. MIS Quarterly 19(2), 213–236 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khmelevsky, Y., Voytenko, V.: Cloud computing infrastructure prototype for university education and research. In: Proceedings of the 15th Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education, pp. 1–5 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kratky, A.: Re-thinking reading in the context of a new wave of electronic reading devices. In: Proceedings of the First international conference on Human-computer interaction, tourism and cultural heritage, pp. 1–11 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kang, Y.-Y., Wang, M.-J.J., Lin, R.: Usability evaluation of e-books. Displays 30(2), 49–52 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Golovchinsky, G.: Reading in the office. In: Proceeding of the 2008 ACM workshop on Research advances in large digital book repositories, pp. 21–24 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Walker, G.H., et al.: From telephones to iPhones: Applying systems thinking to networked, interoperable products. Applied Ergonomics 40(2), 206–215 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ashbrook, D., Lyons, K.: Ensembles of on-body devices. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, pp. 503–504 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blandford, A., et al.: Disrupting digital library development with scenario informed design. Interacting with Computers 19(1), 70–82 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baskerville, R.: Information systems security design methods: implications for information systems development. ACM Comput. Surv. 25(4), 375–414 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moyer, J.E.: Teens today don’t read books anymore: a study of differences in interest and comprehension in multiple modalities. In: Proceedings of the 2011 iConference, pp. 815–816 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tinker, M.A., Paterson, D.G.: Studies of typographical factors influencing speed of reading. VII. Variations in color of print and background. Journal of Applied Psychology 15(5), 471–479 (1931)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hassan, T., Hu, C., Hersch, R.D.: Next generation typeface representations: revisiting parametric fonts. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM symposium on Document engineering, pp. 181–184 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Garcia, M.L., Caldera, C.I.: The effect of color and typeface on the readability of on-line text. Computers & Industrial Engineering 31(1-2), 519–524 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Humar, I., Gradisar, M., Turk, T.: The impact of color combinations on the legibility of a Web page text presented on CRT displays. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 38(11-12), 885–899 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scharff, L.V., Ahumada, A.J.: Why is light text harder to read than dark text? Journal of Vision 5(8), 812 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Churchill, D., Hedberg, J.: Learning object design considerations for small-screen handheld devices. Computers & Education 50(3), 881–893 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burigat, S., Chittaro, L., Gabrielli, S.: Navigation techniques for small-screen devices: An evaluation on maps and web pages. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66(2), 78–97 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gray, W.D., Salzman, M.C.: Damaged merchandise? a review of experiments that compare usability evaluation methods. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 13(3), 203–261 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brown, S.A., et al.: Expectation confirmation: An examination of three competing models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 105(1), 52–66 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maguire, M.: Context of Use within usability activities. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 55(4), 453–483 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kay, J.: A test-first view of usability. Interacting with Computers 21(5-6), 347–349 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hurtienne, J., et al.: Physical gestures for abstract concepts: Inclusive design with primary metaphors. Interacting with Computers 22(6), 475–484 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Park, S., Yoon, S.-H.: Separating early-adopters from the majority: The case of Broadband Internet access in Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 72(3), 301–325 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Todd, K., Mardis, L., Wyatt, P.: We’ve come a long way, baby!: but where women and technology are concerned, have we really? In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM SIGUCCS fall conference, pp. 380–387 (2005)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chau, P.Y.K., Lung Hui, K.: Identifying early adopters of new IT products: A case of Windows 95. Information & Management 33(5), 225–230 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann-Marie Horcher
    • 1
  • Maxine Cohen
    • 1
  1. 1.Nova Southeastern UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations