Skip to main content

Omission Error, Data Requirements, and the Fractal Dimension of the Geoid

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 137))

Abstract

The newest global geopotential model, EGM08, yields significantly improved height anomaly (and geoid undulation) estimates, but not yet at the level of 1cm accuracy. Achieving this goal requires higher resolution gravimetric data (among other advancements, both theoretical and numerical). To determine the necessary data resolution, a statistical approach using the power spectral density (psd) of the height anomaly may be used to relate resolution to standard deviation in omission error. Kaula’s rule was the first such relationship based on a power-law approximation to the psd. It is shown that the Earth’s topography, whose fractal nature implies a power-law attenuation of its psd, and which in many cases is linearly correlated with the gravity anomaly on the basis of Airy’s isostatic assumption, can be used to design approximations to the psd of the local height anomaly, thus leading to estimates of the data resolution required to support the 1cm accuracy level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Colombo OL (1981) Numerical methods for harmonic analysis on the sphere. Report no. 310, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg R (1985) Gravity field terrain effect computations by FFT. Bull Géodés 59(4):342–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck B (1997) Formulation and linearization of boundary value problems: From observables to a mathematical model. In: Sanso F, Rummel R (eds) Geodetic boundary value problems in view of the one centimeter geoid, Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Jekeli C (1996) Spherical harmonic analysis, aliasing, and filtering. J Geodes 70(4):214–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Jekeli C (2003) Statistical analysis of moving-base gravimetry and gravity gradiometry. Report No.466, Laboratory for space geodesy and remote sensing research, geodetic science, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Jekeli C, Yang HJ, Kwon JH (2009) Using gravity and topography-implied anomalies to assess data requirements for precise geoid computation. J Geodes. doi:10.1007/ s00190–009–0337-y

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaula WM (1966) Theory of Satellite Geodesy. Blaisdell, Waltham

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemoine FG, Kenyon SC, Factor JK, Trimmer RG, Pavlis NK, Chinn DS, Cox CM, Klosko SM, Luthcke SB, Torrence MH, Wang YM, Williamson RG, Pavlis EC, Rapp RH, Olson TR (1998) The development of the joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) geopotential model EGM96. NASA Technical Paper NASA/TP-1998–206861, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot B (1983) The Fractal Geometry of Nature. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz H (1980) Advanced Physical Geodesy. Abacus, Tunbridge Wells, Kent

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlis NK, Holmes SA, Kenyon SC, Factor JK (2008) An earth gravitational model to degree 2,160: EGM2008. Presented at the General Assembly of the European Geosciences Union, Vienna, Austria, 13–18 April 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp RH (1979) Potential coefficient and anomaly degree variance modeling revisited. Report no.293, geodetic science, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  • Turcotte DL (1987) A fractal interpretation of topography and geoid spectra on the Earth, Moon, Venus, and Mars. J Geophys Res 92(B4):E597–E601

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant (07KLSGC02), funded through the University of Seoul by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, Seoul, Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Jekeli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jekeli, C. (2012). Omission Error, Data Requirements, and the Fractal Dimension of the Geoid. In: Sneeuw, N., Novák, P., Crespi, M., Sansò, F. (eds) VII Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 137. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22078-4_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics