Advertisement

Reflected in a Liquid Crystal Display: Personalization and the Use of Avatars in Serious Games

  • Shan Lakhmani
  • Clint Bowers
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6774)

Abstract

Personalization, in the realm of Serious Games, is the extent to which users believe that the digital environment is tailored to their characteristics and preferences. This belief can have major repercussions for a user’s experience with the game and can subsequently be used to maximize the return on investment for serious game designers. Other factors that influence users’ personalization in games include how the game affects the users’ perception of self, presence in the game, and social relationships developed in the game. Users’ avatars influence all of these factors. This goal of this paper is to examine the research done into avatars and personalization and presents it in the context of serious games research.

Keywords

avatars personalization presence immersion serious games 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Peirce, N., Conlan, O., Wade, V.: Adaptive Educational Games: Providing Non-Invasive Personalised Learning Experiences. In: 2nd IEEE International Conference on Digital Games and Intelligent Toys Based Education, pp. 28–35. IEEE Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moreno, R., Mayer, R.E.: Personalized Messages That Promote Science Learning in Virtual Environments. J. Edu. Psych. 96, 165–173 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bailey, R., Wise, K., Bolls, P.: How avatar customizability affects children’s arousal and subjective presence during junk food-sponsored online video games. Cyber. Psych. & Beh. 12, 277–283 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krämer, N.: Psychological research on embodied conversational agents: The case of pedagogical agents. J. Media Psych: Theories, Methods, and Applications 22, 47–51 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lewis, M.: The effect of learning type and avatar similarity on learning outcomes in educational video games. Dissertations & Theses: Full Text 70 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jin, S.: Avatars mirroring the actual self versus projecting the ideal self: The effects of self priming on interactivity and immersion in an exergame. Wii. Fit Cyber. Psych. & Beh. 12, 761–765 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bessière, K., Seay, A., Kiesler, S.: The Ideal elf: Identity Exploration in World of Warcraft. Cyber. Psych. & Beh. 10, 530–535 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jin, S., Park, N.: Parasocial interaction with my avatar: Effects of interdependent self-construal and the mediating role of self-presence in an avatar-based console game. Wii. Cyber. Psych. & Beh. 12, 723–727 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vasalou, A., Joinson, A., Bänziger, T., Goldie, P., Pitt, J.: Avatars in social media: Balancing accuracy, playfulness and embodied messages. Int. J. Hum Comp. Stud. 66, 801–811 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Corradi-Dell’Acqua, C., Ueno, K., Ogawa, A., Cheng, K., Rumiati, R.I., Iriki, A.: Effects of shifting perspective of the self: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 40, 1902–1911 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kenny, R.F., Gunter, G.A.: Endogenous fantasy-based serious games: Intrinsic motivation and learning. Int. J. Soc. Sci. 2, 8–13 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van Eck, R.: Digital game based learning: It’s not just the digital natives who are restless. Educause Review 41, 17–30 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen, J.: Flow in Games (and Everything Else). Communications of the ACM 50, 31–34 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lim, S., Reeves, B.: Computer agents versus avatars: Responses to interactive game characters controlled by a computer or other player. Int. J. Hum-Comp. Stud. 68, 57–68 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Feldon, D.F., Kafai, Y.B.: Mixed methods for mixed reality: Understanding users’ avatar activities in virtual worlds. Edu. Tech. R&D 56, 575–593 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Krämer, N.C., Bente, G.: Personalizing e-learning. The social effects of pedagogical agents. Edu. Psych. Rev. 22, 71–87 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shan Lakhmani
    • 1
  • Clint Bowers
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA

Personalised recommendations