Whole Body Interaction Using the Grounded Bar Interface

  • Bong-gyu Jang
  • Hyunseok Yang
  • Gerard J. Kim
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6773)


Whole body interaction is an important element in promoting the level of presence and immersion in virtual reality systems. In this paper, we investigate the effect of “grounding” the interaction device to take advantage of the significant passive reaction force feedback sensed throughout the body, and thus in effect realizing the whole body interaction without complicated sensing and feedback apparatus. An experiment was conducted to assess the task performance and level of presence/immersion, as compared to a keyboard input method, using a maze navigation task. The results showed that while the G-Bar did induce significantly higher presence and the task performance (maze completion time and number of wall collisions) was on par with the already familiar keyboard interface. The keyboard user instead had to adjust and learn how to navigate faster and not collide with the wall over time, indicating that the whole body interaction contributed to a better perception of the immediate space. Thus considering the learning rate and the relative unfamiliarity of G-Bar, with sufficient training, G-Bar could accomplish both high presence/immersion and task performance for s.


Whole-body interaction Presence Immersion Task performance Isometric interaction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kim, G.J.: Designing Virtual Reality Systems: A Structured Approach. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buxton, W.: There’s More to Interaction than Meets the Eye: Some Issues in Manual Input. In: Norman, D.A., Draper, S.W. (eds.) User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 319–337. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1986)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lecuyer, A., Coquillart, S., Kheddar, A.: Pseudo-Haptic Feedback: Can Isometric Input Devices Simulate Force Feedback. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, pp. 83–89 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhai, S.: Investigation of Feel for 6DOF inputs: Isometric and Elastic rate control for manipulation in 3D environments. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (1993)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhai, S.: User Performance in Relation to 3D Input Device Design. Computer Graphics 32(4) (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boulic, R., Maupu, D., Peinado, M., Raunhardt, D.: Spatial Awareness in Full-Body Immersive Interactions: Where Do We Stand? In: Boulic, R., Chrysanthou, Y., Komura, T. (eds.) MIG 2010. LNCS, vol. 6459, pp. 59–69. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Benyon, D., Smyth, M., Helgason, I. (eds.): Presence for Everyone: A Short Guide to Presence Research. The Centre for Interaction Design, Edinburgh Napier University, UK (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peterson, B.: The Influence of Whole-Body Interaction on Wayfinding in Virtual Reality. PhD Thesis, University of Washington (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Konami Digital Entertainment, Inc. Dance Dance Revolution (2010),
  10. 10.
    Nintendo, Inc. Wii,
  11. 11.
    Meehan, M., Whitton, M., Razzaque, S., Zimmon, P., Insko, B., Combe, G., Lok, B., Scheuermann, T., Naik, S., Jerald, J., Harris, M., Antley, A., Brooks, F.: Physiological Reaction and Presence in Stressful Virtual Environments. In: Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bong-gyu Jang
    • 1
  • Hyunseok Yang
    • 1
  • Gerard J. Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Digital Experience LaboratoryKorea UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations