Advertisement

Some Evidences of the Impact of Environment’s Design Features in Routes Selection in Virtual Environments

  • Emília Duarte
  • Elisângela Vilar
  • Francisco Rebelo
  • Júlia Teles
  • Ana Almeida
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6773)

Abstract

This paper reports results from a research project investigating users’ navigation in a Virtual Environment (VE), using immersive Virtual Reality. The experiment was conducted to study the extent that certain features of the environment (i.e., colors, windows, furniture, signage, corridors’ width) may affect the way users select paths within a VE. Thirty university students participated in this study. They were requested to traverse a VE, as fast as possible and without pausing, until they reached the end. During the travel they had to make choices regarding the paths. The results confirmed that the window, corridors’ width, and exit sign factors are route predictors in the extent that they influence the paths selection. The remaining factors did not influence significantly the decisions. These findings may have implications for the design of environments to enhance wayfinding.

Keywords

Virtual Reality Wayfinding paths selection environmental features 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Norman, D.A.: The Design of Everyday Things, 3rd edn. MIT Press, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Conroy, R.: Spatial navigation in immersive virtual environments. Unpublished Dissertation, University of London, London (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carpman, J.R., Grant, M.A.: Design That Cares: Planning Health Facilities for Patients and Visitors, 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    O’Neill, M.J.: Effects of Signage and Floor Plan Configuration on Wayfinding Accuracy Environment and Behavior, vol. 23(5), pp. 553–574 (1991)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smitshuijzen, E.: Signage Design Manual, 1st edn. Lars Muller, Baden (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Passini, R.E.: Wayfinding in complex buildings: An environmental analysis. Man-Environment Systems 10, 31–40 (1980)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weisman, G.D.: Evaluating architectural legibility: Wayfinding in the built environment. Environment and Behavior 13, 189–204 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cubukcu, E.: Investigating Wayfinding Using Virtual Environments. Unpublished Dissertation. Ohio State University, Ohio (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cubukcu, E., Nasar, J.L.: Influence of physical characteristics of routes on distance cognition in virtual environments. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 32(5), 777–785 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Teixeira, L., Rebelo, F., Filgueiras, E.: Human interaction data acquisition software for virtual reality: A user-centered design approach. In: Kaber, D.B., Boy, G. (eds.) Advances in Cognitive Ergonomics, pp. 793–801. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ishihara, S.: Test for Colour-Blindness, 38th edn. Kanehara & Co., Ltd., Tokyo (1988)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emília Duarte
    • 1
  • Elisângela Vilar
    • 2
  • Francisco Rebelo
    • 2
  • Júlia Teles
    • 3
  • Ana Almeida
    • 1
  1. 1.UNIDCOM/IADE – Superior School of DesignLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Ergonomics LaboratoryCruz QuebradaPortugal
  3. 3.Mathematics UnitFMH/Technical University of Lisbon, Estrada da CostaCruz QuebradaPortugal

Personalised recommendations