Skip to main content

Adaptation and the Idea of the Death of the Author: The Case of Samuel Beckett

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Crossroads in Literature and Culture

Part of the book series: Second Language Learning and Teaching ((SLLT))

  • 2124 Accesses

Abstract

The article discusses the usefulness of Ronald Barthes’ concept of the death of the author in reference to the output of Samuel Beckett. On the one hand, the playwright refused to provide any interpretation or explanation of his oeuvre and thus left the finding of its meaning to individual receivers. On the other, however, he rigorously insisted on a strict following of his stage directions, or, to put it differently, on respecting his original vision of the given drama. At present, the faithfulness to the spirit of his output is guarded by the Beckett Estate, represented by his nephew who has to cope with a difficult, if possible at all, task of protecting the authorial rights of his great uncle. The problems connected with the legal status of Beckett’s writings are further complicated by the fact that, in most of the cases, there exist a number of his manuscripts, often introducing changes even in the same language and there are also differences between the French and English versions. As far as the productions of his dramas are concerned the situation is also similar—for instance, apart from the published version of Beckett’s Production Notebook of Happy Days, registering his work on the Royal Court production in 1979, there are three annotated copies prepared by Beckett himself and records made by Martha Fehsenfeld and Alfred Hübner concerning still other productions on which Beckett worked.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, for instance: Culler 1981, pp. 102–118, Culler 1975, pp. 102–152, Głowiński 1986, Jenny 1988, Lachmann 1991 and Pfister 1991.

  2. 2.

    Susanne Langer. Feeling and Form. New York: Scribner’s, 1953, p. 139.

  3. 3.

    See, for instance: Styan 1969, a book which discusses dramatic elements from the perspective of the theatrical theory of drama as well as Abramowska 1976, Hutnikiewicz 1976, Górski 1976, Kleiner 1976, Raszewski 1976, Skwarczyńska 1976a, 1976b, 1976c, and Sławińska 1976.

  4. 4.

    Gerald Rabkin. “Is There a Text on This Stage? Theatre/Authorship/Interpretation.” Performing Arts Journal 9, no. 2, 1985, pp. 142–59.

  5. 5.

    Patricia A. Suchy. “When Words Collide: The Stage Directions as Utterance.” Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism 6, no. 1, Fall 1991, pp. 69–82.

  6. 6.

    Stanley Wells. Literature as Drama. London: 1970, 7. Quoted after Törnikvist 1991, p. 13.

  7. 7.

    Ronald Barthes. „Literature and Signification.” Critical Essays. Transl. Richard Howard. Kingsport, Tenn.: Kingsport Press, 1963. XI.

  8. 8.

    For its discussion, see, among others: Burke 2008, Staiger 1989.

  9. 9.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_the_Author (16. II. 2010).

  10. 10.

    Samuel Beckett to Alan Schneider and many others. Bair 1978, p. 382.

  11. 11.

    Samuel Beckett to Harold Hobson. Bair 1978, pp. 382–383.

  12. 12.

    Samuel Beckett, November 17:1971. Bair 1978, p. 186.

  13. 13.

    Samuel Beckett. Happy Days. London: 1963, p. 30.

  14. 14.

    Guardian 24 March 1994, p. 25.

References

  • Abramowska, J. 1976. Literatura – dramat – teatr. Wprowadzenie do nauki o teatrze. t. 1 – Dramatteatr. Ed. J. Degler. Wrocław: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego:245-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerley, C. J. & S. E. Gontarski, eds. 2006. The Faber Companion to Samuel Beckett. A Reader’s Guide to His Works, Life and Thought. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, D. 2000. Adaptation. In Film Adaptation, ed. James Naremore, 28-37. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bair, D. 1978. Samuel Beckett. A Biography. New York and London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradby, D. 2001. Beckett. Waiting for Godot. Plays in Production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, S. 2008. The Death and Return of the Author. Criticism and Subjectivity in Barthes, Foucault and Derrida. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clurman, H. 1972. On Directing. New York: The Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culler, J. 1981. Presupposition and Intertextuality. The Pursuit of Signs. Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction. London and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul:100–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culler, J. 1975. Structuralist Poetics. Structuralism and Study of Literature. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elam, K. 1980. The Semiotics of Theatre and Drama. London and New York: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Głowiński, M. 1986. O intertekstualności. Pamiętnik Literacki no. 4:75–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Górski, K. 1976. Literatura i teatr. Wprowadzenie do nauki o teatrze. t. 1 – Dramatteatr. Ed. Janusz Wrocław: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego:233–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, M., ed. 1998. No Author Better Served. The Correspondence of Samuel Beckett and Alan Schneider. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, I. 1991. Pluralism in Modern Perspective. The Postmodern Reader. Ed. Ch. Jencks. London: Academy Editions:196–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuvel, M. V. 1991.Performing Drama/Dramatizing Performance. Alternative Theater and the Dramatic Text. Ann Arbour: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornby, R. 1995. Script into Performance: a Structuralist Approach. New York, London: Applause.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, S. 1989. Tom Stoppard’s Stagecraft. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheon, L. 2006. Theory of Adaptation. New York, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutnikiewicz, A. 1976. Czy dramat jest dziełem literackim? Wprowadzenie do nauki o teatrze. t. 1 – Dramatteatr. Ed. J. Degler. Wrocław: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego:77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingarden, R. 1976. O funkcjach mowy w widowisku teatralnym. Wprowadzenie do nauki o teatrze, t. I, Dramatteatr. Ed. J. Degler. Wrocław: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego,

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingarden, R. 1937. O poznawaniu dzieła literackiego. Lwów: Wydawnictwo Zakładu Narodowego Imienia Ossolińskich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingarden, R. 1988. O dziele literackim. Warszawa: PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenny, L. 1988. Strategia formy. Transl. K. and J. Faliccy. Pamiętnik Literacki no. 1:265–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner, J. 1976. Istota utworu dramatycznego. Wprowadzenie do nauki o teatrze. t. 1 – Dramatteatr. Ed. J. Degler. Wrocław: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego:47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. 1980. Desire in Language. A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Ed. L. S. Roudiez. Transl. T. Gora, A. Jardine and L. S. Roudiez. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, R. 1991. Płaszczyzny pojęcia intertekstualności. Transl. M. Lukasiewicz. Pamiętnik Literacki vol. 82, no. 4:209–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libera, A. 2009. Godot i jego cień. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luere, J., ed. 1994. Playwright Versus Director. Authorial Intentions and Performance Interpretations. Contributions in Drama and Theatre Studies no 54. Westport: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavis, P. 1982. Languages of the Stage. Essays in the Semiology of the Theatre. Transl. S. Melrose et. al. New York: Performing Arts Journal Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavis, P. 1998. Słownik terminów teatralnych. Tłum. S. Świontek. Wrocław – Warszawa – Kraków: Zakład Narodowy imienia Ossolińskich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavis, P. 1992. The Theatre at the Crossroads of Culture. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, M. 1991. Koncepcje intertekstualności. Pamiętnik Literacki vol. 82, no. 4:183–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, M. 1993. The Theory and Analysis of Drama. Transl. J. Halliday. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, M. 2000. The Theory and Analysis of Drama. Transl. J. Halliday. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raszewski, Z. 1976. Partytura teatralna. Wprowadzenie do nauki o teatrze. t. 1 – Dramatteatr. Ed. J. Degler. Wrocław: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego:105–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skwarczyńska, S. 1976a. Dramat – literatura czy teatr? Wprowadzenie do nauki o teatrze. t. 1 – Dramatteatr. Ed. J. Degler. Wrocław: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego:223–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skwarczyńska, S. 1976b. Niektóre praktyczne konsekwencje teatralnej teorii dramatu. Wprowadzenie do nauki o teatrze. t. 1 – Dramatteatr. Ed. J. Degler. Wrocław: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego:139–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skwarczyńska, S. 1976c. Zagadnienie dramatu. Wprowadzenie do nauki o teatrze. t. 1 – Dramatteatr. Ed. J. Degler. Wrocław: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego:53–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sławińska, I. 1976. Główne problemy struktury dramatu. Wprowadzenie do nauki o teatrze. t. 1 – Dramatteatr. Ed. J. Degler. Wrocław: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego:85–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staiger, J. 1989. The Death of the Reader. The Cinematic Text Methods and Approaches. Ed. R. B. Palmer. New York: AMS Press:353–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Styan, J. L. 1969. The Elements of Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Törnkvist, E. 1991. Transposing Drama. Studies in Representation. London: MacMillan Education Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ubersfeld, A. 1982. The Pleasure of Spectator. Modern Drama vol. 25, 1 March:127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitelaw, B. 1995. Who He? An Authobiography. London: Sceptre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. 1968. Drama in Performance. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiśniewski, T. 2006. Kształt literacki dramatu Samuela Becketta. Kraków: TAiWPN UNIVERSITAS.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jadwiga Uchman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Uchman, J. (2013). Adaptation and the Idea of the Death of the Author: The Case of Samuel Beckett. In: Fabiszak, J., Urbaniak-Rybicka, E., Wolski, B. (eds) Crossroads in Literature and Culture. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21994-8_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21994-8_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21993-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21994-8

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics