Abstract
We present in this paper a new method to measure the quality of the video in order to change the judgment of the human eye by an objective measure. This latter predicts the mean opinion score (MOS) and the peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) by providing eight parameters extracted from original and coded videos. These parameters that are used are: the average of DFT differences, the standard deviation of DFT differences, the average of DCT differences, the standard deviation of DCT differences, the variance of energy of color, the luminance Y, the chrominance U and the chrominance V. The results we obtained for the correlation show a percentage of 99.58% on training sets and 96.4% on the testing sets. These results compare very favorably with the results obtained with other methods [1].
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Lin, F.H., Mersereau, R.M.: Rate-quality tradeoff MPEG video encoder. Signal Processing : Image Communication 14, 297–300 (1999)
Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C.: Modern Image Quality Assessment. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, USA (2006)
Pinson, M., Wolf, S.: Comparing subjective video quality testing methodologies. In: SPIE Video Communications and Image Processing Conference, Lugano, Switzerland (July 2003)
Zurada, J.M.: Introduction to artificial neural system. PWS Publishiner Company (1992)
Malo, J., Pons, A.M., Artigas, J.M.: Subjective image fidelity metric based on bit allocation of the human visual system in the DCT domain. Image and Vision Computing 15, 535–548 (1997)
Watson, A.B., Hu, J., McGowan, J.F.: Digital video quality metric based on human vision. Journal of Electronic Imaging 10(I), 20–29 (2001)
Sun, H.M., Huang, Y.K.: Comparing Subjective Perceived Quality with Objective Video Quality by Content Characteristics and Bit Rates. In: International Conference on New Trends in Information and Service Science, niss, pp. 624–629 (2009)
Huynh-Thu, Q., Ghanbari, M.: Scope of validity of PSNR in image/video quality assessment. Electronics Letters 44(13), 800–801 (2008)
Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C.: Mean squared error: love it or leave it. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 26(1), 98–117 (2009)
Sheikh, H.R., Bovik, A.C., Veciana, G.d.: An Information Fidelity Criterion for Image Quality Assessment Using Natural Scene Statistics. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 14(12), 2117–2128 (2005)
Juan, D., Yinglin, Y., Shengli, X.: A New Image Quality Assessment Based On HVS. Journal Of Electronics 22(3), 315–320 (2005)
Bouzerdoum, A., Havstad, A., Beghdadi, A.: Image quality assessment using a neural network approach. In: The Fourth IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology, pp. 330–333 (2004)
Beghdadi, A., Pesquet-Popescu, B.: A new image distortion measure based on wavelet decomposition. In: Proc.Seventh Inter. Symp. Signal. Proces. Its Application, vol. 1, pp. 485–488 (2003)
Slanina, M., Ricny, V.: Estimating PSNR without reference for real H.264/AVC sequence intra frames. In: 18th International Conference on Radioelektronika, pp. 1–4 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
El Khattabi, H., Tamtaoui, A., Aboutajdine, D. (2011). Measure a Subjective Video Quality Via a Neural Network. In: Cherifi, H., Zain, J.M., El-Qawasmeh, E. (eds) Digital Information and Communication Technology and Its Applications. DICTAP 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 166. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21984-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21984-9_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21983-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21984-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)