Skip to main content

Argumentation in the View of Modal Logic

  • Conference paper
Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6614))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The paper presents a study of abstract argumentation theory from the point of view of modal logic. The key thesis upon which the paper builds is that argumentation frameworks can be studied as Kripke frames. This simple observation allows us to import a number of techniques and results from modal logic to argumentation theory, and opens up new interesting avenues for further research. The paper gives a glimpse of the sort of techniques that can be imported, discussing complete calculi for argumentation, adequate model-checking and bisimulation games, and sketches an agenda for future research at the interface of modal logic and argumentation theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. van Benthem, J.: An essay on sabotage and obstruction. In: Hutter, D., Stephan, W. (eds.) Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2605, pp. 268–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. van Benthem, J.: Logical Dynamics of Information and Interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Caminada, M.: Semi-stable semantics. In: Dunne, P.E., Bench-Capon, T. (eds.) Proceedings of Computational Models of Argument, COMMA 2006, pp. 121–130 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davey, B.A., Priestley, H.A.: Introduction to Lattices and Order. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. van Ditmarsch, H., Kooi, B., van der Hoek, W.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Synthese Library Series, vol. 337. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77(2), 321–358 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Dunne, P., Bench-Capon, T.: Complexity and combinatorial properties of argument systems. Technical report, University of Liverpool (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fine, K.: Propositional quantifiers in modal logic. Theoria 36, 336–346 (1936)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Fine, K.: In so many possible worlds. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 13, 516–520 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Goranko, V., Otto, M.: Model theory of modal logic. In: Blackburn, P., van Benthem, J., Wolter, F. (eds.) Handbook of Modal Logic. Studies in Logic and Practical Reasoning, vol. 3, pp. 249–329. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Grossi, D.: Doing argumentation theory in modal logic. ILLC Prepublication Series PP-2009-24, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grossi, D.: On the logic of argumentation theory. In: van der Hoek, W., Kaminka, G., Lespérance, Y., Sen, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2010), IFAAMAS, pp. 409–416 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Modgil, S., Caminada, M.: Proof theories and algorithms for abstract argumentation frameworks. In: Rahwan, Y., Simari, G. (eds.) Argumentation in AI. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Oikarinen, E., Woltran, S.: Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks. In: Lin, F., Sattler, U., Truszczynski, M. (eds.) Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference (KR 2010), May 9–13. AAAI Press, Toronto (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, G.: Logics for defeasible argumentation. In: Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd edn., vol. IV, pp. 218–319 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. de Rijke, M.: A note on graded modal logic. Studia Logica 64(2), 271–283 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Venema, Y.: Lectures on the modal μ-calculus. Renmin University in Beijing, China (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Walukiewicz, I.: Completeness of Kozen’s axiomatization of the propositional mu-calculus. Information and Computation 157, 142–182 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Zermelo, E.: Über eine anwendung der mengenlehre auf die theorie des schachspiels. In: Proceedings of the 5th Congress Mathematicians, pp. 501–504. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1913)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Grossi, D. (2011). Argumentation in the View of Modal Logic. In: McBurney, P., Rahwan, I., Parsons, S. (eds) Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. ArgMAS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6614. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21940-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21940-5_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21939-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21940-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics