Skip to main content

Towards a Quality Model for Semantic Technologies

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6786))

Abstract

Semantic technologies have become widely adopted in the last years. However, in order to correctly evaluate them we need to ground evaluations in a common quality model. This paper presents some first steps towards the definition of such quality model for semantic technologies. First, some well-known software quality models are described, together with methods for extending them. Afterwards, a quality model for semantic technologies is defined by extending the ISO 9126 quality model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Behkamal, B., Kahani, M., Akbari, M.K.: Customizing ISO 9126 quality model for evaluation of B2B applications. Information and Software Technology 51(3), 599–609 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. OntoWeb: Ontoweb deliverable 1.3: A survey on ontology tools. Technical report, IST OntoWeb Thematic Network (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guo, Y., Pan, Z., Heflin, J.: LUBM: A benchmark for OWL knowledge base systems. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 3(2-3), 158–182 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lambrix, P., Habbouche, M., Perez, M.: Evaluation of ontology development tools for bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 19, 1564 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. García-Castro, R., Gómez-Pérez, A.: Interoperability results for Semantic Web technologies using OWL as the interchange language. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 8, 278–291 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Garvin, D.A.: What does” product quality” really mean? Sloan Management Review 26(1), 25–43 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kitchenham, B., Pfleeger, S.L.: Software quality: the elusive target [special issues section]. IEEE Software 13(1), 12–21 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cavano, J.P., McCall, J.A.: A framework for the measurement of software quality. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review 7(3-4), 133–139 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boehm, B., Brown, J., Lipow, M.: Quantitative evaluation of software quality. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 592–605. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  10. ISO: ISO/IEC 9126-1:2001, Software engineering – Product quality – Part 1: Quality model. Technical report, International Organization for Standardization (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Botella, P., Burgués, X., Carvallo, J., Franch, X., Pastor, J., Quer, C.: Towards a quality model for the selection of ERP systems. Component-Based Software Quality, 225–245 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Azuma, M.: SQuaRE: the next generation of the ISO/IEC 9126 and 14598 international standards series on software product quality. In: ESCOM (European Software Control and Metrics Conference), pp. 337–346 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dromey, R.G.: Software Product Quality: Theory, Model, and Practice. Software Quality Institute, Brisbane, Australia (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Franch, X., Carvallo, J.P.: Using quality models in software package selection. IEEE Software 20(1), 34–41 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Carvallo, J., Franch, X., Quer, C.: Defining a quality model for mail servers. In: Erdogmus, H., Weng, T. (eds.) ICCBSS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2580, pp. 51–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Zulzalil, H., Ghani, A.A.A., Selamat, M.H., Mahmod, R.: A Case Study to Identify Quality Attributes Relationships for Web-based Applications. IJCSNS 8(11), 215 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Padayachee, I., Kotze, P., van Der Merwe, A.: ISO 9126 external systems quality characteristics, sub-characteristics and domain specific criteria for evaluating e-Learning systems. In: The Southern African Computer Lecturers’ Association, University of Pretoria, South Africa (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dominguez-Mayo, F., Escalona, M., Mejias, M., Torres, A.: A Quality Model in a Quality Evaluation Framework for MDWE Methodologies. In: 2010 Fourth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), pp. 495–506. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Cachero, C., Poels, G., Calero, C.: Towards a quality-aware Web Engineering process. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Exploring Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD 2007), Citeseer, pp. 7–16 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. García-Castro, R., Grimm, S., Toma, I., Schneider, M., Marte, A., Tymaniuk, S.: D10.3 Results of the first evaluation of ontology engineering tools. Technical report, SEALS Consortium (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yatskevich, M., Marte, A.: D11.3 Results of the first evaluation of advanced reasoning systems. Technical report, SEALS Consortium (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Euzenat, J., Meilicke, C., Trojahn, C., Šváb Zamazal, O.: D12.3 Results of the first evaluation of matching tools. Technical report, SEALS Consortium (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wrigley, S.N., Elbedweihy, K., Reinhard, D., Bernstein, A., Ciravegna, F.: D13.3 Results of the first evaluation of semantic search tools. Technical report, SEALS Consortium (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tymaniuk, S., Cabral, L., Winkler, D., Toma, I.: D14.3 Results of the first evaluation of Semantic Web Service tools. Technical report, SEALS Consortium (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Radulovic, F., García-Castro, R. (2011). Towards a Quality Model for Semantic Technologies. In: Murgante, B., Gervasi, O., Iglesias, A., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds) Computational Science and Its Applications - ICCSA 2011. ICCSA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6786. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21934-4_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21934-4_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21933-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21934-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics