Advertisement

How Measure Estate Value in the Big Apple? Walking along Districts of Manhattan

  • Carmelo M. Torre
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6782)

Abstract

The paper explains a procedure to discover the coherence of the relationship between physical distance and real estate value variation.

Many author consider (both in the past and in the recent time) the possibility that real estate value can depend on distance from some central point.

Such convintion lead to the use of geostatistical approaches based on kriging techniques. In the same time literature teach that the market shows a higher value where several amenities are coexisting.

But in those urban realities where the number of central points and the number of amenities is high, the complexity does not support the construction of models, and this complexity leads to a different concept of identity as synthesis of distance, borders and concentration.

The use of fuzzy cluster can support the analysis. The paper gives a brief example about how this works in the case of New York core.

Keywords

Metropolis Real estate market Fuzzy clustering Urban Identity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rosen, S.: Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition. Journal of Political Economy 82(1), 34–55 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Torre, C.M., Mariano, C.: Analysis of Fuzzyness in Spatial Variation of Real Estate Market: Some Italian Case Studies. In: Phillips-Wren, G., Jain, L.C., Nakamatsu, K., Howlett, R.J. (eds.) Advances in Intelligent Decision Technologies. Springer, Berlin (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wojtowicz, R. (ed.): Sidewalk Critic: Lewis Mumford’s Writings on New York. Princeton Architectural Press (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tobler, W.R.: A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography 46(2), 234–240 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bezdek, J.C.: Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algoritms. Plenum Press, New York (1981)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Munda, G.: Social Multicriterial evaluation for a sustainable economy. Springer, Berlin (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hui-yong, Y., Gittelsohn, J.: U.S. Home Values to Drop by $1.7 Trillion This Year. Dec 9, 11:08 (2010), http://www.bloomberg.com
  8. 8.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hartigan, J.: Clustering algorithms. John Wiley and Sons, West Sussex, England (1975)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dunn, J.C.: A Fuzzy Relative of the ISODATA Process and Its Use in Detecting Compact Well-Separated Clusters. Journal of Cybernetics 3, 32–57 (1973)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Takahashi, K., Tango, T.: A flexibly shaped spatial scan statistic for detecting clusters. International Journal of Health Geographics 4, 11–13 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Munda, G., Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P.: Fuzzy multigroup conflict resolution for environmental management". Working paper, Free University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics Sciences, Business Administration and Econometrics (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kerry, R., Haining, R.P., Oliver, M.A.: Geostatistical Methods in Geography: Applications in Human Geography. Geographical Analysis 42/1, 5–6 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miyamoto, S.: Fuzzv sets in information retrieval and cluster analvsis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fusco Girard, L.: The complex social value of the architectural heritage. Icomos Information 1, 19–22 (1986)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carmelo M. Torre
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Architecture and Urban PlanningPolytechnic of BariBariItaly

Personalised recommendations